Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #28072

Re: Calling constructor function with or without new

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: Calling constructor function with or without new
Supersedes <2837981.7vVXDKeSmQ@PointedEars.de>
Date Wed, 10 Jun 2015 19:34:12 +0200
Organization PointedEars Software (PES)
Lines 18
Message-ID <2115940.9N3qDlgpqz@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
References <55745048$0$13014$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <ml2021$1at3$1@adenine.netfront.net> <ml2osq$3q6$1@speranza.aioe.org> <4020474.azVoJSYf4R@PointedEars.de> <ml71mq$4ec$1@speranza.aioe.org> <2573728.VVFZz2FXTb@PointedEars.de> <ml793o$n72$1@speranza.aioe.org> <1856630.MTooSpn00h@PointedEars.de> <ml7ppg$uhn$1@speranza.aioe.org> <1539352.pOhnpQ6Ohf@PointedEars.de> <ml9r84$cqq$1@speranza.aioe.org>
Reply-To Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <cljs@PointedEars.de>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8Bit
X-Trace solani.org 1433957825 27111 eJwFwYkRwDAIA7CV+GyacQgX7z9CJSSd20WwIKi3jBTx6b0696ymDcdH64xrpqDXTHjG5P4cNhDz (10 Jun 2015 17:37:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To abuse@news.solani.org
NNTP-Posting-Date Wed, 10 Jun 2015 17:37:05 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent KNode/4.14.2
Cancel-Key sha1:1H4aVJq+79qRNR7l4i+fcrvXmiY=
X-User-ID eJwNwgkRwEAIBDBLvAvYKY9/CddJXMHoMDjM78fuV35TFRQ7ppI2o9K31SXgk1MQ2EhiajYR7JOc3zbhATpnFMU=
Cancel-Lock sha1:pXPXld97deSXatAiPmFtatkbAn8=
X-NNTP-Posting-Host eJwNxsEBwCAIA8CVUJKg4yjI/iO09zq6hjIgCmx2gDbRHMTyeXHq1Gztv++sjN7rumDv7oo0/wALGBDV
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:28072

Show key headers only | View raw

Joao Rodrigues wrote:

> Thomas Lahn wrote:
> 
> [truisms]

I have only reworded there what I had written before; the meaning of it has 
not changed a bit.  How strange that you can agree with this so much that 
you call it “truisms”, but found it necessary to be impolite in your reply 
to what I had written before.

Maybe you do need to read more carefully.

-- 
PointedEars
FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | SVN: <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/>
Twitter: @PointedEars2 | ES Matrix: <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix>
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Calling constructor function with or without new Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-06-08 00:08 +1000
  Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Martin Honnen <mahotrash@yahoo.de> - 2015-06-07 19:46 +0200
    Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2015-06-07 21:50 -0300
      Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-06-09 15:05 +0200
        Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2015-06-09 12:45 -0300
          Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-06-09 18:32 +0200
            Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2015-06-09 14:51 -0300
              Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-06-09 22:39 +0200
                Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2015-06-09 19:36 -0300
                Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-06-10 18:14 +0200
                Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2015-06-10 14:13 -0300
                Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-06-10 19:34 +0200
                Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2015-06-10 14:57 -0300
                Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-06-10 20:00 +0200
                Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Dr J R Stockton <reply1500@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2015-06-11 21:44 +0100
                Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Hans-Georg Michna <hans-georgNoEmailPlease@michna.com> - 2015-06-11 10:36 +0200
                Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2015-06-11 06:16 -0700
                Re: Calling constructor function with or without new "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2015-06-11 20:40 -0700

csiph-web