Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #15854
| From | "Scott Sauyet" <3103invalid@webnews.fastusenet.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: regexp help |
| Message-ID | <201209111651133103@webnews.fastusenet.org> (permalink) |
| References | <fqydnZxNJ4Gw59TNnZ2dnUVZ_sidnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <aatr4mFvsbU1@mid.uni-berlin.de> <1492793.DGNhQbDWfW@PointedEars.de> |
| Date | 2012-09-11 16:51 +0000 |
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> [ ... ]
> Which gives me the idea that a Unicode mode for jsx.regexp.RegExp() to
> replace \b, \w and \W � in addition to or using the already implemented
> Unicode character properties (\p{Lu} et al.) � would come in handy. �
> Comments anyone?
I think this would be very useful. I haven't looked at the jsx.regexp implementation. Would this be straightforward to add?
I guess I don't know the Unicode spec very well. Are the characters that
would reasonably be included inside an expanded `\w` mode within a few
contiguous blocks? Is the notion of what "would reasonably be included"
even coherent? Obviously you could make whatever call you choose about what
to include, but is there an obvious call to make?
It's quite clear that one that included the extended Latin characters would
be useful, and I imagine it would make sense for alphabets like Greek or
Cyrillic, but the further afield we go from languages I know, the less I
understand the implications. Still, I would love to see it done, even if
only for the simpler cases.
-- Scott
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
regexp help Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-09-07 14:37 +1000
Re: regexp help Jake Jarvis <pig_in_shoes@yahoo.com> - 2012-09-07 10:55 +0200
Re: regexp help Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-09-07 15:36 +0200
Re: regexp help Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-09-08 10:27 +1000
Re: regexp help Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-09-08 09:34 +0200
Re: regexp help "Scott Sauyet" <3103invalid@webnews.fastusenet.org> - 2012-09-11 16:51 +0000
Re: regexp help Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-09-11 22:31 +0200
Re: regexp help "Scott Sauyet" <3103invalid@webnews.fastusenet.org> - 2012-09-19 11:56 +0000
Re: regexp help Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-09-19 18:51 +0200
Re: regexp help Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2012-09-19 12:52 -0700
Re: regexp help Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-09-20 02:13 +0200
Re: regexp help Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2012-09-20 06:51 -0700
Re: regexp help Dr J R Stockton <reply1237@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2012-09-20 20:23 +0100
Re: regexp help "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-09-11 14:55 -0700
csiph-web