Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #14969

Re: javascript multiple inheritance code review.

From "Scott Sauyet" <3103invalid@webnews.fastusenet.org>
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: javascript multiple inheritance code review.
Message-ID <201207091526503103@webnews.fastusenet.org> (permalink)
References <7533f63c-29ac-4765-a915-0511a7c7556b@googlegroups.com> <bccaefa0-81ed-43de-ac4f-ce2e4200be8e@googlegroups.com> <iPdXqZH1$c+PFwSA@invalid.uk.co.demon.merlyn.invalid>
Date 2012-07-09 15:26 +0000

Show all headers | View raw


Dr J R Stockton wrote:
> Jaison Justus posted:
> 
>> [ ... ]  being a js starter and lover, i like to
>> learn more from the experts. i am developing a js library name
>> Webbase.js, you can access it from github (https://github.com/jaisonjus
>> tus/Webbase.js). i planned to improve my js skill by doing a library.
> 
> If you are a js starter, it is several years too soon for it to be fair
> to offer a library for others to use.  That calls for mature experience,
> not trial and error.

I'm going to disagree here.  Jaison shouldn't expect many people to use this 
code unless it proves itself pretty quickly, but writing a reusable library 
is a great way of thinking about how to write good code.  Doing so in a 
public forum is an especially bold way to work with a new technology.  As 
long as the author is willing to accept and learn from criticism, this might 
work out well.

  -- Scott

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

javascript multiple inheritance code review. Jaison Justus <jaison.justus.lp@gmail.com> - 2012-06-28 04:14 -0700
  Re: javascript multiple inheritance code review. "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-06-29 17:04 -0700
  Re: javascript multiple inheritance code review. Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2012-06-29 21:59 -0700
  Re: javascript multiple inheritance code review. Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2012-07-05 04:15 -0700
  Re: javascript multiple inheritance code review. Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2012-07-05 05:06 -0700
  Re: javascript multiple inheritance code review. Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2012-07-05 06:24 -0700
  Re: javascript multiple inheritance code review. Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2012-07-05 08:21 -0700
    Re: javascript multiple inheritance code review. Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2012-07-05 08:23 -0700
  Re: javascript multiple inheritance code review. Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2012-07-05 08:32 -0700
  Re: javascript multiple inheritance code review. Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2012-07-05 13:21 -0700
  Re: javascript multiple inheritance code review. Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2012-07-05 13:35 -0700
    Re: javascript multiple inheritance code review. Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-07-06 00:10 +0200
      Re: javascript multiple inheritance code review. Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2012-07-06 04:02 -0700
        Re: javascript multiple inheritance code review. "Scott Sauyet" <3103invalid@webnews.fastusenet.org> - 2012-07-06 11:43 +0000
        Re: javascript multiple inheritance code review. Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-07-06 10:47 -0700
  Re: javascript multiple inheritance code review. Jaison Justus <jaison.justus.lp@gmail.com> - 2012-07-07 04:25 -0700
    Re: javascript multiple inheritance code review. Dr J R Stockton <reply1227@merlyn.demon.co.uk.not.invalid> - 2012-07-08 19:22 +0100
      Re: javascript multiple inheritance code review. "Scott Sauyet" <3103invalid@webnews.fastusenet.org> - 2012-07-09 15:26 +0000
        Re: javascript multiple inheritance code review. Dr J R Stockton <reply1228@merlyn.demon.co.uk.not.invalid> - 2012-07-10 21:20 +0100
        Re: javascript multiple inheritance code review. Jaison Justus <jaison.justus.lp@gmail.com> - 2012-07-19 04:19 -0700

csiph-web