Re: Adding new method to existing object

Path	csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From	cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com
Newsgroups	comp.lang.javascript
Subject	Re: Adding new method to existing object
Date	Sun, 18 Mar 2012 04:27:58 -0700 (PDT)
Organization	http://groups.google.com
Lines	35
Message-ID	<1976064.3688.1332070078466.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynmb12> (permalink)
References	<31786995.22.1331895413978.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbat19> <fe0320ca-41db-425e-8be2-dcec3878b903@v2g2000vbx.googlegroups.com> <8579633.960.1331987053327.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbux23> <aaeb1f13-3e7e-46d7-bf95-5ece850bf783@j11g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host	79.175.205.52
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	quoted-printable
X-Trace	posting.google.com 1332070080 11085 127.0.0.1 (18 Mar 2012 11:28:00 GMT)
X-Complaints-To	groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date	Sun, 18 Mar 2012 11:28:00 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To	<aaeb1f13-3e7e-46d7-bf95-5ece850bf783@j11g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To	groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info	glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=79.175.205.52; posting-account=fqiM0AoAAACu3aIqzAK2xf9RRpymvKVH
User-Agent	G2/1.0
X-Received-Bytes	2693
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:12876

Show key headers only | View raw

W dniu niedziela, 18 marca 2012, 00:16:47 UTC+1 użytkownik David Mark napisał:
> On Mar 17, 8:24 am, cezary.tomc...@gmail.com wrote:
> > W dniu sobota, 17 marca 2012, 04:15:52 UTC+1 użytkownik Scott Sauyet napisał:
> >
> > > CT wrote:
> > [...]
> > >     //~ I just attach this to the global namespace here instead
> > >     //~ of using the `global` variable to reference `this`.
> >
> > As for global variable with this object I just use now:
> >
> > (function(){ return this || (1,eval)('this') })()
> >
> > based on articlehttp://perfectionkills.com/unnecessarily-comprehensive-look-into-a-ra...
> 
> I'll have to look at that article, but I can't imagine why Kangax
> would recommend such a line of code (even for "strict mode" ES5
> scripts). And, on the Web, there's no reason to be writing strict ES5
> at the moment (if ever). In fact, it could be harmful as a large
> percentage of browsers in use will ignore the "strict" designation,
> creating inconsistencies across agents where there were none. Haven't
> we got enough problems without inventing new ones? :)

Good, very well said. It seems that use "this" alone will be enough.

> By the same token, HTML5 is mostly for show-offs as well. Other than
> for sites that show movies, it's mostly useless (for now).

-- 
Regards,
CT

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Adding new method to existing object cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com - 2012-03-16 03:56 -0700
  Re: Adding new method to existing object David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-16 04:50 -0700
    Re: Adding new method to existing object Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-03-16 15:31 +0100
      Re: Adding new method to existing object David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-16 11:51 -0700
        Re: Adding new method to existing object Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-03-17 00:10 +0100
          Re: Adding new method to existing object David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-16 17:25 -0700
            Re: Adding new method to existing object Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-03-17 02:04 +0100
              Re: Adding new method to existing object David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-16 18:15 -0700
    Re: Adding new method to existing object cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com - 2012-03-16 10:18 -0700
      Re: Adding new method to existing object David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-16 11:56 -0700
      Re: Adding new method to existing object David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-16 13:01 -0700
        Re: Adding new method to existing object cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com - 2012-03-17 04:58 -0700
          Re: Adding new method to existing object David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-17 16:04 -0700
            Re: Adding new method to existing object cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com - 2012-03-18 04:24 -0700
              Re: Adding new method to existing object John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-03-18 13:16 +0000
  Re: Adding new method to existing object John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-03-16 17:09 +0000
    Re: Adding new method to existing object cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com - 2012-03-16 10:46 -0700
  Re: Adding new method to existing object Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2012-03-16 13:43 -0700
  Re: Adding new method to existing object Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2012-03-16 20:15 -0700
    Re: Adding new method to existing object cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com - 2012-03-17 05:17 -0700
    Re: Adding new method to existing object cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com - 2012-03-17 05:24 -0700
      Re: Adding new method to existing object David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-17 16:16 -0700
        Re: Adding new method to existing object cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com - 2012-03-18 04:27 -0700

csiph-web