Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #26806
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Question about appendChild using series of divs |
| Date | Thu, 05 Feb 2015 19:21:20 +0100 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Lines | 100 |
| Message-ID | <1660995.P2mppIif9Y@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | <mar78t$fq8$1@panix3.panix.com> <20656658.1E4ZlvUoOU@PointedEars.de> <mb0b1q$qv8$1@reader1.panix.com> |
| Reply-To | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <cljs@PointedEars.de> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8Bit |
| X-Trace | solani.org 1423160525 1832 eJwFwYEBwDAEBMCVKN5nHBr2HyF3YVD86Qh4bGweGw+hKmVEvgLF0O19lZWSCuwwq3n9jD36GhBC (5 Feb 2015 18:22:05 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@news.solani.org |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Thu, 5 Feb 2015 18:22:05 +0000 (UTC) |
| User-Agent | KNode/4.14.2 |
| X-User-ID | eJwVyMkRwDAIBLCazJrFlMPZfwmZ6CkFD8sulVdX1wcHQkq2yGFCzF9UqfuGIFjPrGGGf1dfa2IixWYQ7R87UxWi |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:VioOBQG1p/ky3L1HC78YO2CEZ90= |
| X-NNTP-Posting-Host | eJwFwQkBwCAMA0BL/RKGHEhX/xK4Q9KpVQQLg9HfHd+WzkqzPVVqS4XRVe4IXaAoHt0B8AAkwhEd |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:26806 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Gordon wrote: ^^^^^^ Again, this is Usenet; please use your full (real) name. > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <cljs@PointedEars.de>: >> Gordon wrote: >> > […] In all five cases I use appendChild to attach the div >> > to the 'H' div. The divs then display in the same order. >> > (I would think they would display in reverse order, >> >> Unfounded. >> >> > since they are being successively appended to 'H', not >> > to the last appended, but they don't.) >> >> “Append” means “to insert at the end” (cf. “prepend”). > > It depends on what 'append' means in this particular > context. Yes. But I think “to append a *child* (node)” is without ambiguity. > If we consider H as a node in a graph > ...-H-... and appending A to H results in ...-H-A-..., > one might think subsequently appending B to H might > be expected to result in ...-H-B-A-..., B being placed > directly after H. But obviously other interpretations > are possible. (Here I am conflating assumptions > about the way the append takes place and the way > the result is subsequently displayed.) You need to consider this not as a linear graph, but a document *tree* of nodes: H :-- A :-- B :-- C '-- D Hence append*Child*. >> > While the page is up, if the user clicks on a link within >> > one of the five divs, say 'C', another set of divs is similarly >> > created, let us say 'c1', 'c2', 'c3', .... These I append >> > to div 'C'. I want them to appear below 'C' and before 'D', >> > but instead they display below 'E'. >> >> You must have appended them to 'H' instead. > > So you seem to agree with my assumption above, that > the layout procedure reads the tree such that if I have appended > c1 to C, then I ought to observe the divs in the > order H, A, B, C, c1, c2, ..., cn, D, .... No, if properly done, the elements are *nested* thus: H :-- A :-- B :-- C : :-- c1 : :-- c2 : :-- ... : '-- cn '-- D But apparently you did: H :-- A :-- B :-- C :-- D :-- c1 :-- c2 :-- ... '-- cn That is, if the order is not as you expected, either you appended the elements to the wrong parent node, or a stylesheet (which can change the positioning of elements in the viewport regardless of source code/node order) interferes. > (For space > reasons the content of the divs will appear vertically, > and inserted material should push the material after it > in the tree downward. Hopefully.) > > Historically, the makers of browsers and script > interpreters do not seem to have felt any obligation > to do things in any particular way, […] You are mistaken. Ex falso quodlibet. -- PointedEars FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | SVN: <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/> Twitter: @PointedEars2 | ES Matrix: <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix> Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Question about appendChild using series of divs gcf@panix.com (Gordon) - 2015-02-03 14:24 -0500
Re: Question about appendChild using series of divs JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2015-02-04 07:10 +0700
Re: Question about appendChild using series of divs gcf@panix.com (Gordon) - 2015-02-05 18:02 +0000
Re: Question about appendChild using series of divs Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-02-04 14:23 +0100
Re: Question about appendChild using series of divs Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-02-04 13:34 +0000
Re: Question about appendChild using series of divs Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-02-04 15:12 +0100
Re: Question about appendChild using series of divs gcf@panix.com (Gordon) - 2015-02-05 17:59 +0000
Re: Question about appendChild using series of divs Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-02-05 19:21 +0100
Re: Question about appendChild using series of divs John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2015-02-05 19:36 +0000
Re: Question about appendChild using series of divs Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-02-07 12:07 +0100
Re: Question about appendChild using series of divs John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2015-02-07 15:20 +0000
csiph-web