Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #12844
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
| Message-ID | <1609776.kdTlGXAFRq@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
| Reply-To | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <cljs@PointedEars.de> |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Date | Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:05:26 +0100 |
| User-Agent | KNode/4.4.11 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8Bit |
| Subject | Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| References | <7577204.4705.1331535049931.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynnk21> <2455587.J1nglo7zMT@PointedEars.de> <2UVL3KD5nyXPFw5i@J.A830F0FF37FB96852AD08924D9443D28E23ED5CD> <jjtmib$h9n$1@news.albasani.net> |
| Followup-To | comp.lang.javascript |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Lines | 46 |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | 17 Mar 2012 12:05:27 CET |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | eb56f40d.newsspool4.arcor-online.net |
| X-Trace | DXC=GnT6HQGIefcg`45cDR8l?o4IUK<Cl32<a4Fo<]lROoRa8kF<OcfhCOk0bK78=TXjmnDZm8W4\YJNlb@mF9jNikdeiHYhD=@VkQc[JH?S1NOXaj |
| X-Complaints-To | usenet-abuse@arcor.de |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:12844 |
Followups directed to: comp.lang.javascript
Show key headers only | View raw
BGB wrote:
> On 3/13/2012 4:05 AM, John G Harris wrote:
>> On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 at 00:03:13, in comp.lang.javascript, Thomas
>> 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> <snip>
>>> There is no "javascript", that is a common misconception.
>> <snip>
>>
>> Is there anyone else who agrees with Thomas ?
>
> technically, one can argue that the "real" language in question is
> ECMAScript, which comes in several varieties:
> JavaScript;
> JScript;
> ActionScript;
> ...
One would be wrong, then. ECMAScript is a standard for object-oriented
programming languages, precisely scripting languages ("programming
language[s] that [are] used to manipulate, customise, and automate the
facilities of an existing system") [1]. JavaScript, JScript, and
ActionScript are some of the different implementations of that standard that
(sometimes conformingly) differ from the standard and from each another;
they are ECMAScript implementations.
It is important to make that distinction, not least because it matters which
implementation is being talked about, as it is the host environment that
defines the implementation that is used. In this case, the ECMAScript
implementation that was being referred to with "javascript" was probably,
but not necessarily, Google V8 3.7.12.12 or later in Google Chrome
17.0.963.78 or later [2].
See also <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix> (a rather extensive update to
include the results of my current work is coming in a few months from now).
PointedEars
___________
[1] Ecma International (June 2011). Standard ECMA-262. ECMAScript
Language Speciļ¬cation. 5.1 Edition.
<http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/files/ECMA-
ST/Ecma-262.pdf> (accessed on 2012-03-17).
[2] <http://code.google.com/p/v8/source/browse/trunk/ChangeLog>
--
When all you know is jQuery, every problem looks $(olvable).
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine R Hall <richkhall@gmail.com> - 2012-03-11 23:50 -0700
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine "Evertjan." <exjxw.hannivoort@interxnl.net> - 2012-03-12 07:59 +0000
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-03-13 00:03 +0100
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-03-13 11:05 +0000
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2012-03-13 12:37 +0100
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 16:24 +0000
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2012-03-16 01:55 +0100
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-03-13 09:03 -0700
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-13 10:53 -0700
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-03-13 12:36 -0700
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2012-03-13 19:07 -0700
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-03-13 22:43 -0700
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2012-03-16 06:09 -0700
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-03-16 12:53 -0700
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-16 13:30 -0700
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-03-16 15:42 -0700
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-16 17:32 -0700
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-14 14:04 -0700
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2012-03-16 01:40 +0100
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-15 14:20 -0700
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-03-16 17:28 +0000
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-16 10:53 -0700
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-03-17 17:00 +0000
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-03-17 12:05 +0100
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-17 10:24 -0700
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Matt McDonald <matt@fortybelow.ca> - 2012-03-16 19:39 -0600
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-16 18:54 -0700
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-03-17 16:53 +0000
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Matt McDonald <matt@fortybelow.ca> - 2012-03-17 13:10 -0600
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-03-18 13:06 +0000
csiph-web