Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #23961
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: I try to write out sigma sign in javascript on a canvas, but HTML encoding do not work, how should i do? |
| Date | 2014-04-26 18:20 +0200 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Message-ID | <1606411.7n5RFCq9OI@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | <9521275e-7eb0-4d31-adc0-76044b3d33e1@googlegroups.com> <535a21aa$0$6703$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> <2732090.DMPj7CqQq3@PointedEars.de> <gUP6v.59558$IN1.5722@en-nntp-15.dc1.easynews.com> |
Richard Damon wrote: > On 4/25/14, 6:42 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >> 2. Without a BOM, a text editor cannot tell UTF-8 encoding from >> a one-byte encoding like ISO-8859-1. One can support UTF-8-capable >> editors by tagging source code. For example, for Vim you can insert >> (at the beginning or the end; I recommend the latter to preserve >> line numbers) > > One nit, despite that many software packages … as required at least by all Web standards (to be) [1][2] … > try to make the inclusion of a BOM indicate UTF-8, it does nothing of the > sorts. The byte sequence 0xEF 0xBB 0xBF (the representation of BOM in > UTF-8) is a perfectly valid ISO-8859-1 character sequence (perhaps > unlikely, but possible and legal). The BOM can be used to distinguish > between UTF-8, UTF-16, and UTF-32, but that is not normally the thing that > needs determining. The UTF-8 code sequence for a Byte Order Mark (BOM), interpreted as one-byte characters, e.g. “” in ISO-8859-1, is a *syntax error* in ECMAScript and other languages (programming languages, formatting languages, and markup languages alike) when appearing at the beginning of source code. Thus, there is no reasonable ambiguity: it is assumed that it is more probable that the author wanted to include a BOM in syntactically valid source code in order to mark the source code as Unicode text than to produce syntactically invalid source code. For that reason, code sequences for a BOM are treated as whitespace in ECMAScript. [3] (However, AFAICS there is no requirement that a conforming implementation must treat source code with a UTF-8 BOM as UTF-8; this includes string literals.) > Also, a BOM is totally unneeded for a UTF-8 file. When saving data in > UTF-16 or UCS-2, the BOM can help distinguish between UTF-16LE and > UTF-16BE, but UTF-8 doesn't have this issue (there is only one possible > byte order for the stream). Fallacy: Denying the antecedent. I have _not_ claimed that it was needed. I have said that *without* a BOM it is *not* possible for a parser to tell whether the source code is UTF-8- encoded. Which, as I also have said, requires character encoding declaration by other means; namely, a suitable “Content-Type” header field value. Thus, I am *well aware* that a BOM is _not_ needed. > Lastly, those programs that want to add the BOM to indicate UTF-8 > encoding are broken in that there are some types of files where the > addition of the BOM at the beginning of the file may well break the > functionality of the file (particularly for scripts). Because of the above, I know to avoid using the BOM for UTF-8 because it causes problems with PHP scripts (_not_ scripts in general). In particular, I use an editor/IDE (Eclipse JSDT) that does not generate a BOM but still supports UTF-8-encoded source code. Congratulations, you have managed to miss the point entirely while posting a lot of nonsense and FUD. ___________ [1] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126/#charencoding> [2] <http://encoding.spec.whatwg.org/#specification-hooks> [3] <http://ecma-international.org/ecma-262/5.1/#sec-7.2> -- PointedEars FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | SVN: <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/> Twitter: @PointedEars2 | ES Matrix: <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix> Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
I try to write out sigma sign in javascript on a canvas, but HTML encoding do not work, how should i do? jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2014-04-25 01:43 -0700
Re: I try to write out sigma sign in javascript on a canvas, but HTML encoding do not work, how should i do? Martin Honnen <mahotrash@yahoo.de> - 2014-04-25 10:49 +0200
Re: I try to write out sigma sign in javascript on a canvas, but HTML encoding do not work, how should i do? jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2014-04-25 02:30 -0700
Re: I try to write out sigma sign in javascript on a canvas, but HTML encoding do not work, how should i do? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-04-25 12:42 +0200
Re: I try to write out sigma sign in javascript on a canvas, but HTML encoding do not work, how should i do? jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2014-04-25 21:26 -0700
Re: I try to write out sigma sign in javascript on a canvas, but HTML encoding do not work, how should i do? jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2014-04-25 21:38 -0700
Re: I try to write out sigma sign in javascript on a canvas, but HTML encoding do not work, how should i do? jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2014-04-25 21:40 -0700
Re: I try to write out sigma sign in javascript on a canvas, but HTML encoding do not work, how should i do? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2014-04-26 11:02 -0400
Re: I try to write out sigma sign in javascript on a canvas, but HTML encoding do not work, how should i do? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-04-26 18:20 +0200
csiph-web