Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #30552

Re: Layered object

Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Date 2016-05-25 23:10 -0700
References (4 earlier) <01b07c96-617e-4d2f-83bc-e85fb4079a99@googlegroups.com> <3e435eda-049d-42e3-a633-5166155388cb@googlegroups.com> <80388e60-d044-40b4-8254-c5b92ed0a019@googlegroups.com> <ebbf4f76-ace5-4be0-b351-0ce9df7adb96@googlegroups.com> <0103beb0-91a3-4349-bcd1-2ccac2898098@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID <0b6f5919-50c2-4f4d-ad39-e8faa04d6c82@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Re: Layered object
From jonas.thornvall@gmail.com

Show all headers | View raw

Den torsdag 26 maj 2016 kl. 08:07:54 UTC+2 skrev jonas.t...@gmail.com:
> Den torsdag 26 maj 2016 kl. 07:57:04 UTC+2 skrev jonas.t...@gmail.com:
> > Den torsdag 26 maj 2016 kl. 02:22:46 UTC+2 skrev Michael Haufe (TNO):
> > > On Tuesday, May 24, 2016 at 7:38:51 AM UTC-5, jonas.t...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I am not sure what all the prescriptions is all about but i sure find them annoying.
> > > 
> > > Prescription drugs? That would explain a bit...
> > 
> > The nonsense ads, i find them annoying. For some reason there usually comes a dozen or so as soon i post some code.
> > 
> > If there is no speed gain i think i keep the simpleton / naive approach. I think beginners in programming will favour understanding that code. When i look at recursive code it look so entangled. 
> > 
> > The operations seems snared into the execution part, with c=a; a=b; b=c; there is really no doubt about what is happening wheter you use a for or a while loop.
> > 
> > Regarding my code, it may not be beautiful but it certainly does what it is meant to do in a miracuous way. Finding Fib nr 100000 and printing it in 5 seconds.
> > 
> > That is a 21033 digit number... so my approach to programming may not be so bad afterall...
> > 
> > And ***I*** did calculate and wrote it out using 2k of code in javascript, a feat you and the other simpletons of this group ;) would not dream of without the help from my code.
> 
> By the way Wolfram Alpha is way off, it seem it cannot handle numbers of that size without doing some dysfunctional approximations.

You see my bignumber approach actually work weither it is 20000, 200 0000 or 2 million digits.

I'm just a tad better.

And it works in anybase.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NJZre-2QBE

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Layered object jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-05-21 10:41 -0700
  Re: Layered object Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-05-21 19:41 -0400
    Re: Layered object jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-05-21 23:42 -0700
      Re: Layered object jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-05-22 03:50 -0700
  Re: Layered object "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-05-22 09:03 -0700
    Re: Layered object jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-05-22 14:59 -0700
      Re: Layered object "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-05-22 15:57 -0700
        Re: Layered object jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-05-22 22:46 -0700
          Re: Layered object "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-05-25 17:13 -0700
        Re: Layered object jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-05-22 23:05 -0700
          Re: Layered object "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-05-25 17:15 -0700
        Re: Layered object jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-05-22 23:08 -0700
        Re: Layered object jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-05-23 08:31 -0700
          Re: Layered object jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-05-24 05:38 -0700
            Re: Layered object "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-05-25 17:22 -0700
              Re: Layered object jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-05-25 22:56 -0700
                Re: Layered object jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-05-25 23:07 -0700
                Re: Layered object jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-05-25 23:10 -0700
                Re: Layered object jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-05-25 23:24 -0700
                Re: Layered object jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-05-26 01:47 -0700
                Re: Layered object jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-05-26 01:53 -0700
                Re: Layered object jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-05-26 02:58 -0700
                Re: Layered object "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-05-26 06:42 -0700
                Re: Layered object Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-05-26 11:30 +0100
                Re: Layered object jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-05-26 03:47 -0700
                Re: Layered object Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2016-05-26 12:43 +0100
                Re: Layered object Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-05-26 14:13 +0100
                Re: Layered object "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-05-26 07:05 -0700
                Re: Layered object jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-05-26 03:51 -0700
                Re: Layered object jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-05-26 04:00 -0700
                Re: Layered object Dr J R Stockton <reply1600@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2016-05-27 22:14 +0100
                Re: Layered object "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-05-26 06:40 -0700
          Re: Layered object "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-05-25 17:21 -0700

csiph-web