Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #24201 > unrolled thread

color coding of text

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.programmer

Contents

  color coding of text don <thedon@here.com> - 2013-05-31 10:38 -0400
    Re: color coding of text Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2013-05-31 17:00 +0200
    Re: color coding of text "dstibbe@gmail.com" <dstibbe@gmail.com> - 2013-05-31 08:13 -0700
    Re: color coding of text lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-05-31 16:56 +0100
      Re: color coding of text Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-06-01 18:10 -0400
    Re: color coding of text Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2013-05-31 09:42 -0700
    Re: color coding of text FredK <fred.l.kleinschmidt@gmail.com> - 2013-05-31 11:25 -0700
      Re: color coding of text Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-05-31 22:19 -0300
    Re: color coding of text Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-05-31 11:48 -0700
      Re: color coding of text don <thedon@here.com> - 2013-05-31 16:34 -0400
        Re: color coding of text Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-05-31 13:43 -0700
          Re: color coding of text don <thedon@here.com> - 2013-05-31 19:17 -0400
            Re: color coding of text Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2013-06-01 12:01 +0200
              Re: color coding of text Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-06-01 09:15 -0300
                Re: color coding of text Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-06-01 18:25 -0400
            Re: color coding of text Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-06-01 18:19 -0400
            Re: color coding of text Rajiv Gupta <rajiv@invalid.com> - 2013-06-03 22:36 +1000
          Re: color coding of text lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-06-01 09:06 +0100
            Re: color coding of text Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2013-06-01 12:02 +0200
              Re: color coding of text lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-06-01 12:28 +0100
                Re: color coding of text Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2013-06-01 13:00 +0000
                Re: color coding of text Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-06-01 18:33 -0400
                  Re: color coding of text Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-06-01 17:26 -0700
                    Re: color coding of text Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-06-01 22:40 -0300
                      Re: color coding of text Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-06-01 21:52 -0400
            Re: color coding of text Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2013-06-01 13:30 +0200
              Re: color coding of text Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-06-01 09:30 -0300
                Re: color coding of text Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-06-01 18:37 -0400
                  Re: color coding of text lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-06-02 08:51 +0100
                    Re: color coding of text Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-06-02 09:47 -0400
                      Re: color coding of text markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-06-02 07:53 -0700
                Re: color coding of text Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2013-06-02 17:46 +0200
                  Re: color coding of text Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-06-02 12:04 -0400
              Re: color coding of text lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-06-01 13:40 +0100
                Re: color coding of text Lars Enderin <lars.enderin@telia.com> - 2013-06-01 20:54 +0200
                  Re: color coding of text lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-06-01 20:04 +0100
                    Re: color coding of text Lars Enderin <lars.enderin@telia.com> - 2013-06-01 21:31 +0200
                    Re: color coding of text Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2013-06-02 19:51 +0200
                      Re: color coding of text Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-06-02 14:11 -0400
                      Re: color coding of text lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-06-02 19:30 +0100
                Re: color coding of text Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-06-01 18:41 -0400
                  Re: color coding of text lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-06-02 09:02 +0100
                    Re: color coding of text Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-06-02 09:41 -0400
                    Re: color coding of text Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2013-06-02 17:47 +0200
                      Re: color coding of text lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-06-02 18:11 +0100
                        Re: color coding of text Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-06-02 14:09 -0400
                        Re: color coding of text Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-06-02 11:45 -0700
                          Re: color coding of text lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-06-02 20:07 +0100
                            Re: color coding of text Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-06-02 12:36 -0700
                              Re: color coding of text lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-06-02 21:24 +0100
        Re: color coding of text Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-06-01 19:31 -0700
          Re: color coding of text lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-06-02 08:57 +0100

Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]

#24242

On 6/1/2013 8:40 AM, lipska the kat wrote:
> On 01/06/13 12:30, Robert Klemme wrote:
>> On 01.06.2013 10:06, lipska the kat wrote:
>>> On 31/05/13 21:43, Lew wrote:
>>>> On Friday, May 31, 2013 1:34:38 PM UTC-7, don wrote:
>>
>>>> The advice is sound. Follow it. Get over yourself.
>>>
>>> Why can't you just give advice?
>>> Why do you always feel it necessary to behave like
>>> a total arsehole?
>>>
>>> Why do you even bother, if you don't think the question a valid one then
>>> why bother to respond?
>>
>> <disclaimer>I'm not Lew so I don't have access to his mind.</disclaimer>
>>   You could look at this from a different perspective: since he *did*
>> bother to answer you could give him the benefit of the doubt and assume
>> that he wants to help.
>
> Plenty of others, including myself managed to reply without giving it
> large with the smart arse attitude.

Actually you did not.

In this thread you have posted:
* 1 reply with some general thoughts about editors
   which is not really related to OP's question
* 4 replies with various personal attacks
so you seems to be the one in this thread with by far
the worst track record on politeness.

Arne

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#24254

On 01/06/13 23:41, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
> On 6/1/2013 8:40 AM, lipska the kat wrote:
>> On 01/06/13 12:30, Robert Klemme wrote:
>>> On 01.06.2013 10:06, lipska the kat wrote:
>>>> On 31/05/13 21:43, Lew wrote:
>>>>> On Friday, May 31, 2013 1:34:38 PM UTC-7, don wrote:
>>>
>>>>> The advice is sound. Follow it. Get over yourself.
>>>>
>>>> Why can't you just give advice?
>>>> Why do you always feel it necessary to behave like
>>>> a total arsehole?
>>>>
>>>> Why do you even bother, if you don't think the question a valid one
>>>> then
>>>> why bother to respond?
>>>
>>> <disclaimer>I'm not Lew so I don't have access to his mind.</disclaimer>
>>>   You could look at this from a different perspective: since he *did*
>>> bother to answer you could give him the benefit of the doubt and assume
>>> that he wants to help.
>>
>> Plenty of others, including myself managed to reply without giving it
>> large with the smart arse attitude.
>
> Actually you did not.
>
> In this thread you have posted:
> * 1 reply with some general thoughts about editors
>    which is not really related to OP's question

Read the post again, no RTFM, no abuse, no smart arse comments.

> * 4 replies with various personal attacks
> so you seems to be the one in this thread with by far
> the worst track record on politeness.

I speak as I find. Get used to it

lipska

-- 
Lipska the Kat©: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer
and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#24257

On 6/2/2013 4:02 AM, lipska the kat wrote:
> On 01/06/13 23:41, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>> On 6/1/2013 8:40 AM, lipska the kat wrote:
>>> On 01/06/13 12:30, Robert Klemme wrote:
>>>> On 01.06.2013 10:06, lipska the kat wrote:
>>>>> On 31/05/13 21:43, Lew wrote:
>>>>>> On Friday, May 31, 2013 1:34:38 PM UTC-7, don wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> The advice is sound. Follow it. Get over yourself.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why can't you just give advice?
>>>>> Why do you always feel it necessary to behave like
>>>>> a total arsehole?
>>>>>
>>>>> Why do you even bother, if you don't think the question a valid one
>>>>> then
>>>>> why bother to respond?
>>>>
>>>> <disclaimer>I'm not Lew so I don't have access to his
>>>> mind.</disclaimer>
>>>>   You could look at this from a different perspective: since he *did*
>>>> bother to answer you could give him the benefit of the doubt and assume
>>>> that he wants to help.
>>>
>>> Plenty of others, including myself managed to reply without giving it
>>> large with the smart arse attitude.
>>
>> Actually you did not.
>>
>> In this thread you have posted:
>> * 1 reply with some general thoughts about editors
>>    which is not really related to OP's question
>
> Read the post again, no RTFM, no abuse, no smart arse comments.
>
>> * 4 replies with various personal attacks
>> so you seems to be the one in this thread with by far
>> the worst track record on politeness.
>
> I speak as I find. Get used to it

Maybe you should get used to how Lew posts ...

Arne

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#24262

On 02.06.2013 10:02, lipska the kat wrote:
> On 01/06/13 23:41, Arne Vajhøj wrote:

>> so you seems to be the one in this thread with by far
>> the worst track record on politeness.
>
> I speak as I find. Get used to it

I can't help but point out how ironic this is: you started out asking 
someone to improve their language to prevent "lowering the tone of the 
group" and end up by asking one "idiot" to "piss off" and suggesting to 
"get used to" your language to another.

I guess that also serves as a strong indication that this type of 
discussion does not help improving things...

Cheers

	robert

-- 
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end
http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#24264

On 02/06/13 16:47, Robert Klemme wrote:
> On 02.06.2013 10:02, lipska the kat wrote:
>> On 01/06/13 23:41, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>
>>> so you seems to be the one in this thread with by far
>>> the worst track record on politeness.
>>
>> I speak as I find. Get used to it
>
> I can't help but point out how ironic this is: you started out asking
> someone to improve their language to prevent "lowering the tone of the
> group" and end up by asking one "idiot" to "piss off" and suggesting to
> "get used to" your language to another.
>
> I guess that also serves as a strong indication that this type of
> discussion does not help improving things...

Well this is all very interesting I'm sure.

Trying to intellectualize this issue only serves to entrench this sort 
of behavior.

I only ever respond in kind, check it out, it's easy enough.
I couldn't care less what your academics say, there is simply no need 
for a first response of RTFM.

Trying to obfuscate the issue by turning it around and making it my 
problem doesn't phase me one bit, I know I'm right.

It's called 'having the courage of ones convictions'

lipska

-- 
Lipska the Kat©: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer
and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#24266

On 6/2/2013 1:11 PM, lipska the kat wrote:
> On 02/06/13 16:47, Robert Klemme wrote:
>> On 02.06.2013 10:02, lipska the kat wrote:
>>> On 01/06/13 23:41, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>>
>>>> so you seems to be the one in this thread with by far
>>>> the worst track record on politeness.
>>>
>>> I speak as I find. Get used to it
>>
>> I can't help but point out how ironic this is: you started out asking
>> someone to improve their language to prevent "lowering the tone of the
>> group" and end up by asking one "idiot" to "piss off" and suggesting to
>> "get used to" your language to another.
>>
>> I guess that also serves as a strong indication that this type of
>> discussion does not help improving things...
>
> Well this is all very interesting I'm sure.
>
> Trying to intellectualize this issue only serves to entrench this sort
> of behavior.
>
> I only ever respond in kind, check it out, it's easy enough.
> I couldn't care less what your academics say, there is simply no need
> for a first response of RTFM.
>
> Trying to obfuscate the issue by turning it around and making it my
> problem doesn't phase me one bit, I know I'm right.
>
> It's called 'having the courage of ones convictions'

Sounds exactly like Lew!

:-)

Arne

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#24270

lipska the kat wrote:
> I only ever respond in kind, check it out, it's easy enough.
> I couldn't care less what your academics say, there is simply no need 
> for a first response of RTFM.

Unless of course you want to give the one single piece of advice that will 
help the OP the most.

-- 
Lew

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#24271

On 02/06/13 19:45, Lew wrote:
> lipska the kat wrote:
>> I only ever respond in kind, check it out, it's easy enough.
>> I couldn't care less what your academics say, there is simply no need
>> for a first response of RTFM.
>
> Unless of course you want to give the one single piece of advice that will
> help the OP the most.

If you don't think a topic worthy of your time why do you bother to respond.

A simple link to a relevant resource would suffice.

I just can't see the point of all the snarky comments.

lipska

-- 
Lipska the Kat©: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer
and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#24272

lipska the kat wrote:
> Lew wrote:
>> lipska the kat wrote:
>>> I only ever respond in kind, check it out, it's easy enough.
>>> I couldn't care less what your academics say, there is simply no need
>>> for a first response of RTFM.
>>
>> Unless of course you want to give the one single piece of advice that will
>> help the OP the most.
> 
> If you don't think a topic worthy of your time why do you bother to respond.

Interrogatives should end in a question mark ("?").

Your premise is false, so the conclusion does not follow. Not only 
did I find the topic worthy of my time, I provided a query which I 
personally vetted, pulled the single most relevant link from the 
search results from that query and provided it, and gave the one single 
piece of advice that would help the OP the most: RTFM.

Read the *FUCKING* manual!

> A simple link to a relevant resource would suffice.

Actually, no, it wouldn't. Give a man a fish, and you only feed him 
for one meal. I gave him a fishing line and showed him how to fish.

> I just can't see the point of all the snarky comments.

Then for God's sake, stop making them!

There's nothing "snarky" about giving the one single piece of advice 
that will help the OP the most. Just because you keep saying over 
and over again that the comment was "snarky" just because you personally 
have a bug up your ass about me doesn't make it true.

Have you tried reading the fucking manual yourself, Mr. Hides-Behind-an-
Anonymous-Handle? Didn't you find it actually empowered you to do so?

-- 
Lew

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#24273

On 02/06/13 20:36, Lew wrote:
> lipska the kat wrote:
>> Lew wrote:
>>> lipska the kat wrote:
>>>> I only ever respond in kind, check it out, it's easy enough.
>>>> I couldn't care less what your academics say, there is simply no need
>>>> for a first response of RTFM.
>>>
>>> Unless of course you want to give the one single piece of advice that will
>>> help the OP the most.
>>
>> If you don't think a topic worthy of your time why do you bother to respond.

[snip]

> There's nothing "snarky" about giving the one single piece of advice
> that will help the OP the most. Just because you keep saying over
> and over again that the comment was "snarky" just because you personally
> have a bug up your ass about me doesn't make it true.

You are anthropomorphizing again aren't you? Why do you think I care one 
way or another about you. I don't know you and I don't care to know you. 
What I object to is your constant smart arsed comments when replying to 
new posters to this group.

Let me guess, you 'design' computer systems that have a Person class.

> Have you tried reading the fucking manual yourself, Mr. Hides-Behind-an-
> Anonymous-Handle? Didn't you find it actually empowered you to do so?

I read plenty thank you and the more I read the more I realize that I 
will never know it all. Unlike you of course who thinks that everyone 
else is beneath you and feels the need to reinforce this erroneous 
perception by constantly being an arsehole.

lipska

-- 
Lipska the Kat©: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer
and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#24250

don wrote:
> Not the highlight color, the *text* color!
> 
> I bet you don't speak to people like that in person.

You set up a meeting and I will not only tell you "RTFM"
to your face, I'll throw in a "GIYF" for free.

-- 
Lew

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#24253

On 02/06/13 03:31, Lew wrote:
> don wrote:
>> Not the highlight color, the *text* color!
>>
>> I bet you don't speak to people like that in person.
>
> You set up a meeting and I will not only tell you "RTFM"
> to your face, I'll throw in a "GIYF" for free.

Can I attend?

Is this you Bloch

http://www.linkedin.com/in/lewbloch

I've always wanted to go to San Fransisco

lipska

-- 
Lipska the Kat©: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer
and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.programmer

csiph-web