Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #39006 > unrolled thread

Re: Pronunciation question

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.programmer

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Pronunciation question Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2019-07-17 12:00 -0400

#39006 — Re: Pronunciation question

On 7/17/2019 10:20 AM, Stefan Ram wrote:
>    Could someone confirm or deny the following stress patterns
>    for an American English (San Francisco Bay Area) pronunciation?
> 
> boxing       ˈbɑksɪŋ (found in a dictionary)
> unboxing     ˌʌnˈbɑksɪŋ (not listed in a dictionary)
> autoboxing   ˈɔtoʊˌbɑksɪŋ (not listed in a dictionary)
> autounboxing ˈɔtoʊʌnˌbɑksɪŋ (not listed in a dictionary)
> 
> ˈ means primary   accent (stress) for the following syllable
> 
> ˌ means secondary accent (stress) for the following syllable

     I pronounce "unboxing" as ˈʌnˈbɑksɪŋ, that is, with two
approximately equal stresses.  If anything, the second stress
may be very slightly the weaker.

     I pronounce "autounboxing" as "auto-unboxing," almost as
two independent words: ˈɔto ˈʌnˈbɑksɪŋ.  In this situation,
the third stress would be noticeably weaker than the others.

     ... except that pronunciation may vary in the service of
emphasis.  For example, if I were trying to explain the
difference between autoboxing and autounboxing I would surely
give a lot of stress to the "un" of the latter, exaggerating
its distinction from the former.  Again, if I were discussing
(manual) boxing versus autoboxing I would certainly land quite
hard on the "auto."

     (Disclaimer: Not a philologist, nor a Californian.)


-- 
esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid
Five hundred fifty-three days to go.

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.programmer

csiph-web