Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #35673 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Roedy Green <inquiry@mindprod.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-09-30 03:05 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-10-01 11:12 -0400 |
| Articles | 5 on this page of 25 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.programmer
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Java is faster! Roedy Green <inquiry@mindprod.com> - 2016-09-30 03:05 -0700
Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-01 12:50 +0200
Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-01 12:53 +0200
Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-01 11:36 -0400
Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-01 23:39 +0200
Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-02 08:32 -0400
Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-02 18:36 +0200
Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-02 20:08 -0400
Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-03 10:54 +0200
Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-03 10:55 +0200
Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-03 11:01 +0200
Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-03 19:56 -0400
Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-04 11:08 +0200
Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-04 19:50 -0400
Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-03 19:59 -0400
Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-03 20:04 -0400
Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-03 20:14 -0400
Re: Java is faster! Brixomatic <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-05 11:02 +0200
Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-06 19:55 +0200
Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-06 20:22 +0200
Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-06 18:16 -0400
Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-07 02:51 +0200
Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-08 09:56 -0400
Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-01 11:19 -0400
Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-01 11:12 -0400
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-06 18:16 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nt6ifn$19e9$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #35732 |
On 10/6/2016 1:55 PM, j4n bur53 wrote: > And still there seems a way: > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12669606/windows-8-store-certification-for-a-windows-desktop-app-written-in-java I believe Project Centennial is the desktop bridge already mentioned. Big question is what it actually does. It is at least some places referenced to as a converter. Arne
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-07 02:51 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <nt6rik$5td$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #35734 |
Someone on SO also told me to also look at side loading: https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/itpro/windows/deploy/sideload-apps-in-windows-10 To could serve as a testing environment, before going into the windows store. It has been simplified from Windos 8 to Windows 10. Arne Vajhøj schrieb: > On 10/6/2016 1:55 PM, j4n bur53 wrote: >> And still there seems a way: >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12669606/windows-8-store-certification-for-a-windows-desktop-app-written-in-java >> > > I believe Project Centennial is the desktop bridge already mentioned. > > Big question is what it actually does. It is at least some places > referenced to as a converter. > > Arne > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 09:56 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ntatve$9dh$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #35735 |
On 10/6/2016 8:51 PM, j4n bur53 wrote: > Someone on SO also told me to also look at side loading: > https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/itpro/windows/deploy/sideload-apps-in-windows-10 > > To could serve as a testing environment, before going > into the windows store. It has been simplified from Windos 8 > to Windows 10. I believe that side load is your own store meaning your rules. It is still not clear to me how the the desktop bridge make a general win32 app run inside the sandbox. But lots of things is possible. MS just announced that they will make the Edge browser run in a temporary VM for insecure sites. Arne
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-01 11:19 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nsok61$18g4$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #35675 |
On 10/1/2016 6:50 AM, j4n bur53 wrote: > What is Jet? This one? > https://www.excelsiorjet.com/ Yep. Arne
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-01 11:12 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nsojop$17s6$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #35673 |
On 9/30/2016 6:05 AM, Roedy Green wrote: > On 23 Sep 2016 13:31:38 GMT, ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) > wrote: >> "Java is faster! >> In terms of throughput in a long running system ... >> For specific applications ... >> On a well tuned JVM ... >> With near-optimal GC strategy selected ..." >> >> says Chandler Carruth, one of Google's C++ experts. (JFTR) > > I wrote some time ago about how astoundingly clever Jet was at > optimising code generation. I was far faster than anything a human > assembler programmer would generate. It was convoluted, but fast. I doubt that Google use Jet. Arne
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.programmer
csiph-web