Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #34167 > unrolled thread

jdk 1.8.0_92

Started byRoedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid>
First post2016-04-19 12:57 -0700
Last post2016-04-21 05:13 -0700
Articles 11 — 6 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.programmer


Contents

  jdk 1.8.0_92 Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2016-04-19 12:57 -0700
    Re: jdk 1.8.0_92 Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 04:56 -0700
      Re: jdk 1.8.0_92 Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-04-21 19:43 -0400
        Re: jdk 1.8.0_92 Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 06:04 -0700
          Re: jdk 1.8.0_92 v_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert) - 2016-04-22 18:17 +0000
            Re: jdk 1.8.0_92 Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 12:43 -0700
          Re: jdk 1.8.0_92 Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-04-22 19:47 -0400
            Re: jdk 1.8.0_92 Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-04-22 20:54 -0400
              Re: jdk 1.8.0_92 Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-04-22 20:56 -0400
      Re: jdk 1.8.0_92 Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-04-23 14:08 +0200
    Re: jdk 1.8.0_92 shaikrafiitvidya@gmail.com - 2016-04-21 05:13 -0700

#34167 — jdk 1.8.0_92

FromRoedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid>
Date2016-04-19 12:57 -0700
Subjectjdk 1.8.0_92
Message-ID<3b3dhbd808u0c7753dn3iojt8u0anqpe1p@4ax.com>
jdks 1.8.0_91 and 1.8.0_92 are out.
-- 
Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products http://mindprod.com
The standard definition of AI is that which we don't understand.
~ Bill Joy (born:1954-11-08 age:61), co-inventor of Java.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#34173

FromEric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com>
Date2016-04-21 04:56 -0700
Message-ID<1b71bf31-462b-431b-bfbb-b08c3849cf03@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#34167
On Tuesday, April 19, 2016 at 3:57:21 PM UTC-4, Roedy Green wrote:
> jdks 1.8.0_91 and 1.8.0_92 are out.
> -- 
> Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products http://mindprod.com
> The standard definition of AI is that which we don't understand.
> ~ Bill Joy (born:1954-11-08 age:61), co-inventor of Java.

They're running out of numbers...Java 9 coming soon

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#34178

FromArne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk>
Date2016-04-21 19:43 -0400
Message-ID<nfbojh$mk5$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#34173
On 4/21/2016 7:56 AM, Eric Douglas wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 19, 2016 at 3:57:21 PM UTC-4, Roedy Green wrote:
>> jdks 1.8.0_91 and 1.8.0_92 are out.
>
> They're running out of numbers...

It is just a String so:

1.80_nnn
1.80_nnnn
1.80_nnnnn
...

:-)

 > Java 9 coming soon

March 2017 is the latest ETA I believe.

Arne



[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#34181

FromEric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com>
Date2016-04-22 06:04 -0700
Message-ID<ef1d8923-40f3-4309-856f-dcdbf4f571ff@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#34178
On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 7:44:07 PM UTC-4, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
> It is just a String so:
> 
> 1.80_nnn
> 1.80_nnnn
> 1.80_nnnnn
> ...
> 
> :-)
> 

Well, currently there's nothing after the 91/92.  I would think adding _nn after the string would only be for minor patches.  I don't think they've had more than 99 updates for one Java version before.  If they name it 1.8.0_100 that should annoy some people since "100" < "90".

>  > Java 9 coming soon
> 
> March 2017 is the latest ETA I believe.
> 
> Arne

Java 8 has been out for many months.  I thought the schedule was one major version per year.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#34182

Fromv_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert)
Date2016-04-22 18:17 +0000
Message-ID<nfdpqu$8je$1@Gaia.teknon.de>
In reply to#34181
Eric Douglas wrote:

> I don't think they've had more than 99 updates for one Java version
> before.

http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/tzdata-versions-138805.html
lists 1.6.0_115 and 1.7.0_101 for customers willing to pay BIG $$$.
And https://jdk8.java.net/download.html offers 1.8.0_102-b03 early
access build.

-- 

"I'm a doctor, not a mechanic." Dr Leonard McCoy <mccoy@ncc1701.starfleet.fed>
"I'm a mechanic, not a doctor." Volker Borchert  <v_borchert@despammed.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#34183

FromEric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com>
Date2016-04-22 12:43 -0700
Message-ID<41d3003d-2a3b-4c6d-862a-93fc50ce6b2a@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#34182
On Friday, April 22, 2016 at 3:02:05 PM UTC-4, Volker Borchert wrote:
> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/tzdata-versions-138805.html
> lists 1.6.0_115 and 1.7.0_101 for customers willing to pay BIG $$$.
> And https://jdk8.java.net/download.html offers 1.8.0_102-b03 early
> access build.

Ah the big money builds.  I just use free Java, which requires you to use new major versions, and I don't recall seeing > 99.  If they've used 100+ on the extended Java, where you can pay them to support a single major version, it seems they're soon going to make a 100+ for the free updates.  This seems short sighted.  If they want to put out so 100+ minor versions, the current version 92 should be 1.8.0_092, so when they get to 1.8.0_102 it will still sort correctly alphabetically.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#34185

FromArne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk>
Date2016-04-22 19:47 -0400
Message-ID<nfed6s$rge$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#34181
On 4/22/2016 9:04 AM, Eric Douglas wrote:
> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 7:44:07 PM UTC-4, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>> It is just a String so:
>>
>> 1.80_nnn 1.80_nnnn 1.80_nnnnn ...
>>
>> :-)
>>
>
> Well, currently there's nothing after the 91/92.  I would think
> adding _nn after the string would only be for minor patches.  I don't
> think they've had more than 99 updates for one Java version before.
> If they name it 1.8.0_100 that should annoy some people since "100" <
> "90".

I don't think that will hold them back. It did not prevent them from
going 1.8.0_5 to 1.8.0_11.

>>> Java 9 coming soon
>>
>> March 2017 is the latest ETA I believe.
>
> Java 8 has been out for many months.  I thought the schedule was one
> major version per year.

I think it was one every other year.

Java 8 came out in 2014.

Java 9 was originally planned for 2016. But it got postponed to 2017.

Not the first big IT project to get delayed.

:-)

Arne



[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#34187

FromArne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk>
Date2016-04-22 20:54 -0400
Message-ID<nfeh3o$vgo$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#34185
On 4/22/2016 7:47 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
> On 4/22/2016 9:04 AM, Eric Douglas wrote:
>> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 7:44:07 PM UTC-4, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>>> It is just a String so:
>>>
>>> 1.80_nnn 1.80_nnnn 1.80_nnnnn ...
>>>
>>> :-)
>>>
>>
>> Well, currently there's nothing after the 91/92.  I would think
>> adding _nn after the string would only be for minor patches.  I don't
>> think they've had more than 99 updates for one Java version before.
>> If they name it 1.8.0_100 that should annoy some people since "100" <
>> "90".
>
> I don't think that will hold them back. It did not prevent them from
> going 1.8.0_5 to 1.8.0_11.

Hmm. Actually it may have been 1.8.0_05.

I know that they went from 8u5 to 8u11, but that does not really
say anything about the 1.8.0_* numbering.

Mea culpa.

Arne

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#34188

FromArne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk>
Date2016-04-22 20:56 -0400
Message-ID<nfeh7i$vgo$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#34187
On 4/22/2016 8:54 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
> On 4/22/2016 7:47 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>> On 4/22/2016 9:04 AM, Eric Douglas wrote:
>>> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 7:44:07 PM UTC-4, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>>>> It is just a String so:
>>>>
>>>> 1.80_nnn 1.80_nnnn 1.80_nnnnn ...
>>>>
>>>> :-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Well, currently there's nothing after the 91/92.  I would think
>>> adding _nn after the string would only be for minor patches.  I don't
>>> think they've had more than 99 updates for one Java version before.
>>> If they name it 1.8.0_100 that should annoy some people since "100" <
>>> "90".
>>
>> I don't think that will hold them back. It did not prevent them from
>> going 1.8.0_5 to 1.8.0_11.
>
> Hmm. Actually it may have been 1.8.0_05.
>
> I know that they went from 8u5 to 8u11, but that does not really
> say anything about the 1.8.0_* numbering.

In fact the documentation state nn.

http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/versioning-naming-139433.html

<quote>
The two digits following the underbar indicate the update number. The
higher the number, the more recent the update.
</quote>

> Mea culpa.

Yes.

Arne

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#34189

FromJan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Date2016-04-23 14:08 +0200
Message-ID<nffok2$4id$1@news.albasani.net>
In reply to#34173
Eric Douglas schrieb:
> On Tuesday, April 19, 2016 at 3:57:21 PM UTC-4, Roedy Green wrote:
>> jdks 1.8.0_91 and 1.8.0_92 are out.
>> --
>> Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products http://mindprod.com
>> The standard definition of AI is that which we don't understand.
>> ~ Bill Joy (born:1954-11-08 age:61), co-inventor of Java.
>
> They're running out of numbers...Java 9 coming soon
>

The could continue hexadecimal:

99 -> 9A -> 9B -> ..
9F -> A0 -> ..

Makeing all the string sorters happy.

But I guess the age:61 cannot be fixed,
towards age:99 there will EoPU or something.

Bye

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#34174

Fromshaikrafiitvidya@gmail.com
Date2016-04-21 05:13 -0700
Message-ID<d48b5655-8f01-408e-96c6-4553b3b0e005@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#34167
IT VIDYA offers java Online Training for All Modules.

Visit Us : http://www.itvidya.co/adobe-cq5-online-training/

CONTACT US:

IT Vidya

US : 972-646-8090

India : +91 9966881730

Email : info@itvidya.co

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.programmer


csiph-web