Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #32139 > unrolled thread

Simple example for writing and testing your own annotations

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.programmer

Contents

  Simple example for writing and testing your own annotations Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-07-25 17:09 +0200
    Re: Simple example for writing and testing your own annotations Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2015-07-27 18:31 +0200
      Re: Simple example for writing and testing your own annotations Eternal Hope <laughingspam99@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 18:29 +0100
      Re: Simple example for writing and testing your own annotations Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-07-27 19:37 +0200
      Re: Simple example for writing and testing your own annotations lipska the kat <dont@email.me> - 2015-07-27 20:21 +0100
      Re: Simple example for writing and testing your own annotations Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-07-27 19:43 -0400

#32139 — Simple example for writing and testing your own annotations

I wrote a simple example for writing and testing your own annotations:
    https://github.com/CecilWesterhof/JavaExamples/tree/master/Annotations

-- 
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#32164

On 25.07.2015 17:09, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> I wrote a simple example for writing and testing your own annotations:
>      https://github.com/CecilWesterhof/JavaExamples/tree/master/Annotations

Usenet - at least in my understanding - is a forum for discussions and 
not for distributing links.  Please post these things to 
https://www.reddit.com/r/java/ instead.  Thank you!

Kind regards

	robert


-- 
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end
http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#32165

On 27/07/2015 17:31, Robert Klemme wrote:
> On 25.07.2015 17:09, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> I wrote a simple example for writing and testing your own annotations:
>>
>> https://github.com/CecilWesterhof/JavaExamples/tree/master/Annotations
>
> Usenet - at least in my understanding - is a forum for discussions and
> not for distributing links.  Please post these things to
> https://www.reddit.com/r/java/ instead.  Thank you!

Since when?
This is a Java language group.
Who made this rule and when?
Are you employed by Reddit, first I've heard of posting code/links to a 
bloody social netwanking site.

Fcuk Reddit, really, get a grip man.


-- 
Laughing Spam Fritter

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#32166

On Monday 27 Jul 2015 18:31 CEST, Robert Klemme wrote:

> On 25.07.2015 17:09, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> I wrote a simple example for writing and testing your own
>> annotations:
>> https://github.com/CecilWesterhof/JavaExamples/tree/master/Annotations
>
> Usenet - at least in my understanding - is a forum for discussions
> and not for distributing links. Please post these things to
> https://www.reddit.com/r/java/ instead. Thank you!

It is also for helping each-other. I found that it is hard to get good
information about writing your own annotations. That is why I gave
this link: to help others creating there own annotations with less
effort.

-- 
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#32167

On 27/07/15 17:31, Robert Klemme wrote:
> On 25.07.2015 17:09, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> I wrote a simple example for writing and testing your own annotations:
>>
>> https://github.com/CecilWesterhof/JavaExamples/tree/master/Annotations
>
> Usenet - at least in my understanding - is a forum for discussions and
> not for distributing links.  Please post these things to
> https://www.reddit.com/r/java/ instead.  Thank you!
>
> Kind regards
>
>      robert

Please be warned, there will probably be some bad language later on

I mean what the *fuck* are you on about now.

People moan that Usenet is dying, if it is, it's because of people like 
you. I have no idea who this Cecil Westerhof character is, he may well 
be a sock puppet, however, and this is the important bit, he's asked 
some perfectly reasonable questions, gone away and written some 
perfectly reasonable *Java* code and offered it up for criticism and 
discussion to you idiots and all you can do is find something to have a 
pop about. Now I agree that we get some chancers here, homework 
layabouts deserve a certain amount of distain but why do you find it 
necessary to be so bloody objectionable to *every* *single* *new* 
*poster* who happens by c.l.j.p. You don't criticize our old friend 
Stefan when he posts his dreadful garbage, so why in the name sanity 
would you criticize someone who actually post something *useful*

Please stop it, it's really pissing me off


-- 
lipska the kat.
I'm back.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#32168

On 7/27/2015 12:31 PM, Robert Klemme wrote:
> On 25.07.2015 17:09, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> I wrote a simple example for writing and testing your own annotations:
>>
>> https://github.com/CecilWesterhof/JavaExamples/tree/master/Annotations
>
> Usenet - at least in my understanding - is a forum for discussions and
> not for distributing links.  Please post these things to
> https://www.reddit.com/r/java/ instead.  Thank you!

Really? Why do a bunch of *.*.*announce groups exist then?

Since c.l.j.announce was removed in 2010 then announcements
of stuff related to Java programming must be considered
on topic in c.l.j.programmer.

And I would even tend to say that it was on topic before
if it was sufficiently programming centric (at least
cross post).

Arne

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.programmer

csiph-web