Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #31435 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sebastian <news@seyweiler.dyndns.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-04-01 16:42 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-04-01 16:42 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.programmer
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: .parallelStream() Sebastian <news@seyweiler.dyndns.org> - 2015-04-01 16:42 +0200
| From | Sebastian <news@seyweiler.dyndns.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-01 16:42 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: .parallelStream() |
| Message-ID | <mfh040$icm$1@news.albasani.net> |
Am 01.04.2015 16:08, schrieb Stefan Ram: > I read somewhere that streams can be executed in parallel. > > Somewhere else I read, that one needs to call > ».parallelStream()« for parallel execution. > > So, do I get it right, that the JVM will never execute a > stream obtained by ».stream()« in parallel, even if it can > detect that this will be faster and yield the same outcome, > unless the programmer has explicitly enabled this via > ».parallelStream()«? > Yes. You may also use stream().parallel(). There is no place for implicit parallelism anywhere in Java. The aim in designing the Streams API was to make it "unobtrusive". -- Sebastian
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.programmer
csiph-web