Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #30031 > unrolled thread
| Started by | JKdr <jkdr@siberianoutpost.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-09-29 19:07 -0400 |
| Last post | 2014-09-30 16:13 -0400 |
| Articles | 9 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.programmer
any find and replace one-pass algorithm processing multiple strings at once? JKdr <jkdr@siberianoutpost.com> - 2014-09-29 19:07 -0400
Re: any find and replace one-pass algorithm processing multiple strings at once? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-09-29 19:36 -0400
Re: any find and replace one-pass algorithm processing multiple strings at once? JKdr <jkdr@siberianoutpost.com> - 2014-09-29 19:52 -0400
Re: any find and replace one-pass algorithm processing multiple strings at once? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-09-29 20:37 -0400
Re: any find and replace one-pass algorithm processing multiple strings at once? thinbluernime <thinbluernime3@gmail.com> - 2014-09-30 07:07 +0000
Re: any find and replace one-pass algorithm processing multiple strings at once? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-09-30 08:39 -0400
Re: any find and replace one-pass algorithm processing multiple strings at once? Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2014-09-30 19:22 +0200
Re: any find and replace one-pass algorithm processing multiple strings at once? JKdr <jkdr@siberianoutpost.com> - 2014-09-30 15:54 -0400
Re: any find and replace one-pass algorithm processing multiple strings at once? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-09-30 16:13 -0400
| From | JKdr <jkdr@siberianoutpost.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-09-29 19:07 -0400 |
| Subject | any find and replace one-pass algorithm processing multiple strings at once? |
| Message-ID | <m0coli$hsj$3@speranza.aioe.org> |
lbrtchx
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-09-29 19:36 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <m0cqd9$l6b$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #30031 |
On 9/29/2014 7:07 PM, JKdr wrote: > lbrtchx pisppmd Probably "Yes," given suitable preconditions. Lacking them, probably "No." hth -- esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JKdr <jkdr@siberianoutpost.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-09-29 19:52 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <m0crbo$on5$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #30032 |
> Probably "Yes," given suitable preconditions. The only input I think is needed is an input stream and its encoding > Lacking them, probably "No." I spent some time trying to find an implementation of such a thing, which I think shouldn't be a big deal at least in the case that you don't use regex, just strings to find ... It seems, Java's implementations of matchers touch the string more than once (I have run a few tests buffering the file into char arrays the monkey way) I think the data strat of such an algo is based on a graph/decision tree, which are used in state machines and such things Unless I am missing something lbrtchx
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-09-29 20:37 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <m0ctvo$82e$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #30033 |
On 9/29/2014 7:52 PM, JKdr wrote: > > Probably "Yes," given suitable preconditions. > > The only input I think is needed is an input stream and its encoding > > > Lacking them, probably "No." > > I spent some time trying to find an implementation of such a thing, > which I think shouldn't be a big deal at least in the case that you > don't use regex, just strings to find ... > > It seems, Java's implementations of matchers touch the string more > than once (I have run a few tests buffering the file into char arrays > the monkey way) > > I think the data strat of such an algo is based on a graph/decision > tree, which are used in state machines and such things > > Unless I am missing something That's a possibility. I repeat: pisppmd. -- esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | thinbluernime <thinbluernime3@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-09-30 07:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m0dkrn$8he$2@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #30035 |
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 20:37:12 -0400, Eric Sosman wrote: > That's a possibility. I repeat: pisppmd. Perhaps you'd have more luck if you repeated it, but this time in English.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-09-30 08:39 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <m0e8ac$6oa$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #30036 |
On 9/30/2014 3:07 AM, thinbluernime wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 20:37:12 -0400, Eric Sosman wrote:
>
>> That's a possibility. I repeat: pisppmd.
>
> Perhaps you'd have more luck if you repeated it, but this time in English.
The original question, in its totality, was
lbrtchx
I'm merely trying to reply in kind.
--
esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-09-30 19:22 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wnvv32zq11oa.afeo45nzyqks.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #30037 |
On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:39:39 -0400, Eric Sosman wrote: > On 9/30/2014 3:07 AM, thinbluernime wrote: >> On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 20:37:12 -0400, Eric Sosman wrote: >>> That's a possibility. I repeat: pisppmd. >> Perhaps you'd have more luck if you repeated it, but this time in English. > The original question, in its totality, was > lbrtchx > I'm merely trying to reply in kind. All Google could tell me about it was that it meant that the OP is apparently into sado/maso gimp sex play, whatever that might be. Liebe Gruesse, Joerg -- Ich lese meine Emails nicht, replies to Email bleiben also leider ungelesen.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JKdr <jkdr@siberianoutpost.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-09-30 15:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <m0f1p0$1r5$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #30038 |
On 09/30/2014 01:22 PM, Joerg Meier wrote: > On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:39:39 -0400, Eric Sosman wrote: > >> On 9/30/2014 3:07 AM, thinbluernime wrote: >>> On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 20:37:12 -0400, Eric Sosman wrote: >>>> That's a possibility. I repeat: pisppmd. >>> Perhaps you'd have more luck if you repeated it, but this time in English. >> The original question, in its totality, was > >> lbrtchx > >> I'm merely trying to reply in kind. > > All Google could tell me about it was that it meant that the OP is > apparently into sado/maso gimp sex play, whatever that might be. > > Liebe Gruesse, > Joerg > Exactly! I haven't found better google hits than those to profile me. Great Lord! You don't even need the NSA, google + people's hominid stupidity will do just fine! However, I didn't need google to notice when/how we, apparently technical people, behave like moronic politicians and lawyers My half cent. lbrtchx
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-09-30 16:13 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <m0f2tt$spr$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #30040 |
On 9/30/2014 3:54 PM, JKdr wrote:
>[...]
> However, I didn't need google to notice when/how we, apparently
> technical people, behave like moronic politicians and lawyers
I've had little contact with politicians, but as for lawyers:
One thing I've noticed about them is that they ask *very* well-
framed questions.
That's an area in which many of us could improve ...
--
esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.programmer
csiph-web