Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #26464 > unrolled thread

Re: PRINTING DIAMOND SHAPE WITH LOOPS!

Started byjyothi.m1089@gmail.com
First post2013-11-01 01:30 -0700
Last post2013-11-29 12:48 -0500
Articles 9 on this page of 29 — 8 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.programmer

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: PRINTING DIAMOND SHAPE WITH LOOPS! jyothi.m1089@gmail.com - 2013-11-01 01:30 -0700
    Re: PRINTING DIAMOND SHAPE WITH LOOPS! rossum <rossum48@coldmail.com> - 2013-11-01 13:03 +0000
    Re: PRINTING DIAMOND SHAPE WITH LOOPS! Mike Amling <mamling@chaff.us> - 2013-11-01 09:59 -0500
    Re: PRINTING DIAMOND SHAPE WITH LOOPS! Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2013-11-01 18:32 -0700
      Re: PRINTING DIAMOND SHAPE WITH LOOPS! pchristor@yahoo.co.uk - 2013-11-12 05:21 -0800
        Re: PRINTING DIAMOND SHAPE WITH LOOPS! Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-11-27 15:57 -0800
          Re: PRINTING DIAMOND SHAPE WITH LOOPS! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-11-27 19:21 -0500
          Re: PRINTING DIAMOND SHAPE WITH LOOPS! pchristor@yahoo.co.uk - 2013-11-28 17:45 -0800
            Re: PRINTING DIAMOND SHAPE WITH LOOPS! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-11-28 21:10 -0500
              Re: PRINTING DIAMOND SHAPE WITH LOOPS! pchristor@yahoo.co.uk - 2013-11-29 03:03 -0800
                Re: PRINTING DIAMOND SHAPE WITH LOOPS! Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2013-11-29 12:33 +0100
                  Re: PRINTING DIAMOND SHAPE WITH LOOPS! pchristor@yahoo.co.uk - 2013-11-29 09:01 -0800
                    Re: PRINTING DIAMOND SHAPE WITH LOOPS! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-11-29 13:15 -0500
                      Re: PRINTING DIAMOND SHAPE WITH LOOPS! pchristor@yahoo.co.uk - 2013-11-29 17:06 -0800
                        Re: PRINTING DIAMOND SHAPE WITH LOOPS! pchristor@yahoo.co.uk - 2013-11-29 17:24 -0800
                        Re: PRINTING DIAMOND SHAPE WITH LOOPS! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-11-29 20:59 -0500
                          Re: PRINTING DIAMOND SHAPE WITH LOOPS! pchristor@yahoo.co.uk - 2013-11-30 06:57 -0800
                            Re: PRINTING DIAMOND SHAPE WITH LOOPS! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-11-30 10:31 -0500
                            Re: PRINTING DIAMOND SHAPE WITH LOOPS! Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-12-02 15:32 -0800
                              Re: PRINTING DIAMOND SHAPE WITH LOOPS! pchristor@yahoo.co.uk - 2013-12-04 03:45 -0800
                                Re: PRINTING DIAMOND SHAPE WITH LOOPS! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-12-09 21:10 -0500
                              Re: PRINTING DIAMOND SHAPE WITH LOOPS! pchristor@yahoo.co.uk - 2013-12-05 00:15 -0800
                                Re: PRINTING DIAMOND SHAPE WITH LOOPS! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-12-09 21:14 -0500
                    Re: PRINTING DIAMOND SHAPE WITH LOOPS! Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2013-11-29 19:58 +0100
                      Re: PRINTING DIAMOND SHAPE WITH LOOPS! pchristor@yahoo.co.uk - 2013-11-29 17:12 -0800
                        Re: PRINTING DIAMOND SHAPE WITH LOOPS! Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2013-11-30 02:55 +0100
                        Re: PRINTING DIAMOND SHAPE WITH LOOPS! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-11-29 21:01 -0500
                        Re: PRINTING DIAMOND SHAPE WITH LOOPS! Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-12-02 15:31 -0800
                Re: PRINTING DIAMOND SHAPE WITH LOOPS! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-11-29 12:48 -0500

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#26814

FromArne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk>
Date2013-12-09 21:10 -0500
Message-ID<52a67820$0$293$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
In reply to#26724
On 12/4/2013 6:45 AM, pchristor@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> On Monday, 2 December 2013 23:32:20 UTC, Lew  wrote:
>> On Saturday, November 30, 2013 6:57:33 AM UTC-8, pchr...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
>>>   I agree with you encouraging others to follow a standard coding convention but you must remember that to not follow it is not incorrect.
>>
>> Yes, it is.
>
> If you want to understand the meaning of big words try looking up the meaning of convention.
>
> *PLonK*

Your loss.

Arne

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#26732

Frompchristor@yahoo.co.uk
Date2013-12-05 00:15 -0800
Message-ID<6ef3fadf-1516-4806-b2ad-881ebb6a59c5@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#26704
On Monday, 2 December 2013 23:32:20 UTC, Lew  wrote:
> On Saturday, November 30, 2013 6:57:33 AM UTC-8, pchr...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> 
> >  I agree with you encouraging others to follow a standard coding convention but you must remember that to not follow it is not incorrect.
> 
> 
> 
> Yes, it is.
> 
> 
> 
> > Comparing this to a truth or a lie for example is a prime example and is an incorrect analogy.
> 
> 
> 
> No, it is not.
> 
> 
> 
> Instead of being obstreperous, you should accept the coaching and thank those who offered it.
> 
> 
> 
> Your argumentativeness does not augur well for your continued progress.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Lew

Actually you are the same idiot who responded to an answer as though it was a question. Maybe you don't understand English or something but you seem to have a problem and you come across as being hostile and nasty. 
You really need to sort out your problem of being horrible and nasty because that's not what these forums are about even if you did have a good argument.
 As for the argument in question I don't see any point in holding a debate with an hostile idiot who thinks a convention is a rule.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#26815

FromArne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk>
Date2013-12-09 21:14 -0500
Message-ID<52a67903$0$303$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
In reply to#26732
On 12/5/2013 3:15 AM, pchristor@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> On Monday, 2 December 2013 23:32:20 UTC, Lew  wrote:
>> On Saturday, November 30, 2013 6:57:33 AM UTC-8,
>> pchr...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
>>> I agree with you encouraging others to follow a standard coding
>>> convention but you must remember that to not follow it is not
>>> incorrect.
>>
>> Yes, it is.

> Actually you are the same idiot who responded to an answer as though
> it was a question.

Usenet hint: name calling does not convince many.

>                    Maybe you don't understand English or something

There is a thing called Google that you could use to check out
(and reject) that hypothesis.

> but you seem to have a problem and you come across as being hostile
> and nasty. You really need to sort out your problem of being horrible
> and nasty because that's not what these forums are about even if you
> did have a good argument. As for the argument in question I don't see
> any point in holding a debate with an hostile idiot who thinks a
> convention is a rule.

I am pretty sure that Lew did not consider a convention a rule - that
is something you just made up.

Arne

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#26675

FromJoerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de>
Date2013-11-29 19:58 +0100
Message-ID<1ibxvrati43m0$.1obb9na9d8r0n.dlg@40tude.net>
In reply to#26670
On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 09:01:24 -0800 (PST), pchristor@yahoo.co.uk wrote:

> I may have a tab or a new line out of place but I wouldn't go as far 
> as to say that its non standard, against coding conventions or unpleasant 
> to read just because of that. The google browser seems to add spaces 
> to it anyway.

Well of course YOU don't think anything is wrong with it, you're the one
who wrote it! If you knew you were doing it wrong you wouldn't have done it
in the first place.

You asked which coding conventions you didn't follow, and now you have your
answer. If you'd now like to argue that you didn't mean to follow some
conventions in the first place, it seems silly that you asked about it at
all.

Liebe Gruesse,
		Joerg

-- 
Ich lese meine Emails nicht, replies to Email bleiben also leider
ungelesen.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#26679

Frompchristor@yahoo.co.uk
Date2013-11-29 17:12 -0800
Message-ID<3f12b042-9120-4dd3-821a-f815578c3764@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#26675
On Friday, 29 November 2013 18:58:04 UTC, Joerg Meier  wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 09:01:24 -0800 (PST), pchristor@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> > I may have a tab or a new line out of place but I wouldn't go as far 
> 
> > as to say that its non standard, against coding conventions or unpleasant 
> 
> > to read just because of that. The google browser seems to add spaces 
> 
> > to it anyway.
> 
> 
> 
> Well of course YOU don't think anything is wrong with it, you're the one
> 
> who wrote it! If you knew you were doing it wrong you wouldn't have done it
> 
> in the first place.
> 
> 
> 
> You asked which coding conventions you didn't follow, and now you have your
> 
> answer. If you'd now like to argue that you didn't mean to follow some
> 
> conventions in the first place, it seems silly that you asked about it at
> 
> all.
> 
> 
> 
> Liebe Gruesse,
> 
> 		Joerg
> 
> 
>
I didn't say there is nothing wrong with it, I realise its a little bit untidy but I didn't think it to be all that bad that I'd be pulled up about it. 
And I haven't had the answer actually, I still don't know to which coding conventions are being referred. All I have been told is that the coding conventions which are being referred too require a) spaces around binary operators and b) four spaces for indentation.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#26681

FromJoerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de>
Date2013-11-30 02:55 +0100
Message-ID<o87cjao9g0r8.1spwfew901o1z.dlg@40tude.net>
In reply to#26679
On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 17:12:36 -0800 (PST), pchristor@yahoo.co.uk wrote:

> And I haven't had the answer actually, I still don't know to which
> coding conventions are being referred. All I have been told is that the
> coding conventions which are being referred too require a) spaces
> around binary operators and b) four spaces for indentation.

I think we were all under the impression that you wanted to know the
specific violations, which Arne listed for you earlier. We were of course
referring to the "Java Code Conventions", which you can currently find at:

<http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/codeconvtoc-136057.html>

Liebe Gruesse,
		Joerg

-- 
Ich lese meine Emails nicht, replies to Email bleiben also leider
ungelesen.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#26683

FromArne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk>
Date2013-11-29 21:01 -0500
Message-ID<52994707$0$303$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
In reply to#26679
On 11/29/2013 8:12 PM, pchristor@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> On Friday, 29 November 2013 18:58:04 UTC, Joerg Meier  wrote:
>> You asked which coding conventions you didn't follow, and now you have your
>> answer. If you'd now like to argue that you didn't mean to follow some
>> conventions in the first place, it seems silly that you asked about it at
>> all.

> I didn't say there is nothing wrong with it, I realise its a little
> bit untidy but I didn't think it to be all that bad that I'd be
> pulled up about it. And I haven't had the answer actually, I still
> don't know to which coding conventions are being referred. All I have
> been told is that the coding conventions which are being referred too
> require a) spaces around binary operators and b) four spaces for
> indentation.

http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/codeconv-138413.html

Arne

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#26703

FromLew <lewbloch@gmail.com>
Date2013-12-02 15:31 -0800
Message-ID<cccaa049-da17-475c-87a4-fee39fcef8a4@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#26679
On Friday, November 29, 2013 5:12:36 PM UTC-8, pchr...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> On Friday, 29 November 2013 18:58:04 UTC, Joerg Meier  wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 09:01:24 -0800 (PST), pchristor@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> > > I may have a tab or a new line out of place but I wouldn't go as far 
> > > as to say that its non standard, against coding conventions or unpleasant 
> > > to read just because of that. The google browser seems to add spaces 
> > > to it anyway.
> 
> > Well of course YOU don't think anything is wrong with it, you're the one
> > who wrote it! If you knew you were doing it wrong you wouldn't have done it
> > in the first place.
> 
> > You asked which coding conventions you didn't follow, and now you have your
> > answer. If you'd now like to argue that you didn't mean to follow some
> > conventions in the first place, it seems silly that you asked about it at
> > all.
> 
> I didn't say there is nothing wrong with it, I realise its a little bit untidy but I didn't think it to be all that bad that I'd be pulled up about it. 

It was.

The conventions have been published for a decade and a half, more or less. You should be familiar
with them.

> And I haven't had the answer actually, I still don't know to which coding conventions are being referred. All I have been told is that the coding conventions which are being referred too require a) spaces around binary operators and b) four spaces for indentation.

Why, the standard Java coding conventions that have been around probably since before you ever
hear of Java, of course.

http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/codeconv-138413.html 

You should be grateful for the information.

-- 
Lew

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#26671

FromArne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk>
Date2013-11-29 12:48 -0500
Message-ID<5298d37c$0$303$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
In reply to#26662
On 11/29/2013 6:03 AM, pchristor@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> On Friday, 29 November 2013 02:10:32 UTC, Arne Vajhøj  wrote:
>> On 11/28/2013 8:45 PM, pchristor@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, 27 November 2013 23:57:07 UTC, Lew  wrote:
>>>> Start by following the coding conventions, please.
>>>
>>> What coding conventions are not being followed?
>>
>> Indentation, new lines and the usage of spaces are all
>> non standard.
>
> I'm afraid the spaces are necessary.I would like to see your standard
 > code, which contains no spaces, please post a short example.

The standard says less spaces for indentation and more spaces in
expressions.

I suggest you read it.

> I don't see how this answers the question about coding conventions. Is
 > "non-standard" == "not following coding conventions" ??

Yes. When the topics are within coding convention domain.

Arne

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.programmer

csiph-web