Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #39026 > unrolled thread

Calling the other overloaded method

Started byCecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl>
First post2019-07-30 15:14 +0200
Last post2019-07-30 17:32 +0200
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.programmer


Contents

  Calling the other overloaded method Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2019-07-30 15:14 +0200
    Re: Calling the other overloaded method "Jeffrey H. Coffield" <jeffrey@digitalsynergyinc.com> - 2019-07-30 06:47 -0700
    Re: Calling the other overloaded method Lars Enderin <lars.enderin@telia.com> - 2019-07-30 17:32 +0200

#39026 — Calling the other overloaded method

FromCecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl>
Date2019-07-30 15:14 +0200
SubjectCalling the other overloaded method
Message-ID<878ssfoeav.fsf@munus.decebal.nl>
I do not think it is important, but better save as sorry: I am doing
this in jshell.


When I have the following code:
    Long[] getFibonacciArray() {
        return null; // getFibonacciArray(0);
    }

    Long[] getFibonacciArray(int from) {
        return getFibonacciStream().skip(from).toArray(Long[]::new);
    }

It compiles without problem. But I want the first method to be:
    Long[] getFibonacciArray() {
        return getFibonacciArray(0);
    }

But when using this, I get:
    |  Error:
    |  method getFibonacciArray in class  cannot be applied to given types;
    |    required: no arguments
    |    found: int
    |    reason: actual and formal argument lists differ in length
    |      return getFibonacciArray(0);
    |             ^---------------^

What am I doing wrong?

-- 
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#39027

From"Jeffrey H. Coffield" <jeffrey@digitalsynergyinc.com>
Date2019-07-30 06:47 -0700
Message-ID<qhphqg$9m0$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#39026

On 07/30/2019 06:14 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> I do not think it is important, but better save as sorry: I am doing
> this in jshell.
>
>
> When I have the following code:
>     Long[] getFibonacciArray() {
>         return null; // getFibonacciArray(0);
>     }
>
>     Long[] getFibonacciArray(int from) {
>         return getFibonacciStream().skip(from).toArray(Long[]::new);
>     }
>
> It compiles without problem. But I want the first method to be:
>     Long[] getFibonacciArray() {
>         return getFibonacciArray(0);
>     }
>
> But when using this, I get:
>     |  Error:
>     |  method getFibonacciArray in class  cannot be applied to given types;
>     |    required: no arguments
>     |    found: int
>     |    reason: actual and formal argument lists differ in length
>     |      return getFibonacciArray(0);
>     |             ^---------------^
>
> What am I doing wrong?
>

I can't replicate the problem on my system, but your code isn't a 
complete example as it doesn't define getFibonacciStream.

Jeff Coffield
www.digtalsynergyinc.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#39028

FromLars Enderin <lars.enderin@telia.com>
Date2019-07-30 17:32 +0200
Message-ID<bd26105c-d0ef-9970-aaf0-461161961e62@telia.com>
In reply to#39026
2019-07-30 15:14 skrev  Cecil Westerhof:
> I do not think it is important, but better save as sorry: I am doing
> this in jshell.

The idiom is "better safe than sorry". Your version is unintelligible. HTH.

-- 
Lars Enderin

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.programmer


csiph-web