Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #40018 > unrolled thread

Re: Socks + NIO possible?

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.programmer

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Socks + NIO possible? weiqi fan <sherlockffff@gmail.com> - 2023-10-11 20:31 -0700

#40018 — Re: Socks + NIO possible?

在 2009年4月21日星期二 UTC+8 01:50:06，<Christian> 写道：
> Peter Duniho schrieb:
> > On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 19:47:08 -0700, Christian <fake...@xyz.de> wrote:
> > 
> >> [...]
> >> My hope was that there was sort of an alike way to handle Proxys 
> >> without having to change all code where SocketChannels are in use.
> >>
> >> There just is no .connect() method for socketChannel that allows for a 
> >> proxy..
> > 
> > Well, I admit I haven't used it. But as I mentioned, it appears to me 
> > that you can use the ProxySelector class (or more specifically, your own 
> > implementation of the class) to globally direct all Socket i/o to use a 
> > particular proxy server.
> > 
> > I agree that the restriction on SocketChannel, where (as the docs say) 
> > "It is not possible to create a channel for an arbitrary, pre-existing 
> > socket", means you can't construct a Socket to use a specific proxy. 
> > But as long as you can deal with setting it on a global basis (at least 
> > temporarily, while you create the SocketChannel you need), it seems like 
> > it would work.
> > 
> > Pete
> Problem I have is: SocketChannel seems to ignore global settings.
> It just doesn't work here.
> Christian
Have you resolved this problem？

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.programmer

csiph-web