Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #25645 > unrolled thread

Re: Why “new”?

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.programmer

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-08 16:28 +0100

#25645 — Re: Why “new”?

On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 20:32:21 +0800, Peter Duniho wrote:

> On 2/8/11 7:33 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
>> Since the only part of Peter's query that was obvious to me was the
>> letter "j", it is relevant. The rest of it Peter got from his prior
>> knowledge that J was a programming language -- knowledge I did not
>> share with him at that time.
> 
> Bull.

How rude.

The rest of your post has been ignored.

Get back to me when you are in a better mood.

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.programmer

csiph-web