Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #25479 > unrolled thread

Re: Why No Supplemental Characters In Character Literals?

Started byKen Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com>
First post2011-02-05 08:15 +0100
Last post2011-02-05 08:15 +0100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.programmer

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Why No Supplemental Characters In Character Literals? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-05 08:15 +0100

#25479 — Re: Why No Supplemental Characters In Character Literals?

FromKen Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com>
Date2011-02-05 08:15 +0100
SubjectRe: Why No Supplemental Characters In Character Literals?
Message-ID<4d4cf913$1@news.x-privat.org>
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 22:28:57 -0800, Mike Schilling wrote:

> "Ken Wesson" <kwesson@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:4d4ceaf3$1@news.x-privat.org...
>> On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:46:56 -0800, Mike Schilling wrote:
>>
>>> "Ken Wesson" <kwesson@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:4d4cc888$1@news.x-privat.org...
>>>> On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 22:30:09 -0500, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 04-02-2011 22:21, Ken Wesson wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 17:02:37 -0800, Mike Schilling wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Arne Vajhøj"<arne@vajhoej.dk>  wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:4d4ca055$0$23765$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
>>>>>>>> Which is a bit surprising since high code points were introduced
>>>>>>>> when .NET came around.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But they probably had a compatibility issue with p/Invoke and
>>>>>>>> Win32 API, COM interop, C++ mixed mode etc. that all had to work
>>>>>>>> with existing Win32 model of 16 bit wchars.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Or, relentless micro-optimizers that they are, Microsoft wasn't
>>>>>>> willing to bite off the size/performance issues.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Relentless micro-optimizers of what, their cashflow?
>>>>>
>>>>> Micro optimization in the meaning it has among programmers.
>>>>
>>>> Microsoft doesn't know beans about optimizing program code, as anyone
>>>> who's waited five mintues for Windows to start up and become fully
>>>> responsive can attest. :)
>>>
>>> Optimization and micro-optimization are not synonyms.
>>
>> No; the latter is a special case of the former.
> 
> The latter is quite often the direct opposite of the former.

If so, then it has been mis-named and you should clarify your original 
meaning.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.programmer


csiph-web