Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #39846
| From | Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Any software law experts? |
| Date | 2022-11-09 14:38 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <tkgvji$1vl8$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <fee4fd9f-8b60-4703-9c7b-2551cff7ee37n@googlegroups.com> <tkesfg$1ohq$1@gioia.aioe.org> <6672570a-42f6-4a92-a427-92e342ce1235n@googlegroups.com> |
On 11/9/2022 7:21 AM, e.d.pro...@gmail.com wrote: >> There are 3 fundamental types of open source licenses: * permissive >> (Apache, MIT, BSD etc.) * weak copy left (LGPL, GPL with linking >> exception, MPL etc.) * strong copy left (GPL, AGPL) >> > It appears with LGPL you can make a closed source product and the > code of your dependency must be available somewhere, no special > requirement when you're not modifying their code. The LGPL library must be independently upgradeable. > With AGPL it > appears if you use their library, you must make all your source > available to all users of your app when you're using the dependency > unmodified, that the AGPL states this requirement for when you're > modifying the third party code apparently includes using it as a > dependency as a modification. The only way around this is to write > something using the third party code that runs independently of your > main app code, where your app is viable without that piece. You can use the AGPL code with your code for your self or internal in your organization. But if you distribute your code or make your code available as SaaS then the users has the right to not only the original AGPL code but also to your code under AGPL. And if you do not comply with that, then you have no right to use the original AGPL code. Arne
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Any software law experts? "e.d.pro...@gmail.com" <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2022-11-08 06:00 -0800
Re: Any software law experts? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2022-11-08 19:32 -0500
Re: Any software law experts? "e.d.pro...@gmail.com" <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2022-11-09 04:21 -0800
Re: Any software law experts? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2022-11-09 14:38 -0500
Re: Any software law experts? "e.d.pro...@gmail.com" <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2022-11-09 11:51 -0800
Re: Any software law experts? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2022-11-09 16:12 -0500
Re: Any software law experts? "e.d.pro...@gmail.com" <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2022-11-09 04:53 -0800
Re: Any software law experts? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2022-11-09 14:34 -0500
Re: Any software law experts? "e.d.pro...@gmail.com" <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2022-11-09 11:42 -0800
Re: Any software law experts? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2022-11-09 14:50 -0500
Re: Any software law experts? "e.d.pro...@gmail.com" <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2022-11-09 11:55 -0800
Re: Any software law experts? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2022-11-09 20:21 -0500
csiph-web