Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #31672
| From | Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: best and worst sorting algorithm for 1 to 10,000 and then 10,000 + elements |
| Date | 2015-05-11 14:00 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <t162latr1e10ir0vhkr46krlr2mrlnatgr@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | <c26476e6-86b7-494b-a2e8-4d9eb7f7bbd7@googlegroups.com> |
On Mon, 4 May 2015 10:39:26 -0700 (PDT), Ajay Paul
<ajaykpaul@gmail.com> wrote:
>what are the best and worst sorting algorithm for 1 to 10,000 and then 10,000 + elements.
>
>I understand that bubble short is worst.
You need to hit the books.
For example, bubble sort can do very well with nearly-sorted
data, and quick sort does not.
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
best and worst sorting algorithm for 1 to 10,000 and then 10,000 + elements Ajay Paul <ajaykpaul@gmail.com> - 2015-05-04 10:39 -0700
Re: best and worst sorting algorithm for 1 to 10,000 and then 10,000 + elements Marcel Mueller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2015-05-04 19:54 +0200
Re: best and worst sorting algorithm for 1 to 10,000 and then 10,000 + elements Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2015-05-09 07:58 -0400
Re: best and worst sorting algorithm for 1 to 10,000 and then 10,000 + elements Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2015-05-04 14:16 -0400
Re: best and worst sorting algorithm for 1 to 10,000 and then 10,000 + elements Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2015-05-04 14:27 -0400
Re: best and worst sorting algorithm for 1 to 10,000 and then 10,000 + elements Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-05-08 20:42 +0000
Re: best and worst sorting algorithm for 1 to 10,000 and then 10,000 + elements v_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert) - 2015-05-11 02:32 +0000
Re: best and worst sorting algorithm for 1 to 10,000 and then 10,000 + elements Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2015-05-11 14:00 -0700
Re: best and worst sorting algorithm for 1 to 10,000 and then 10,000 + elements Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2015-05-11 17:27 -0400
Re: best and worst sorting algorithm for 1 to 10,000 and then 10,000 + elements Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-06-03 21:53 -0400
csiph-web