Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #37166
| Path | csiph.com!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Is this a correct implementation of an abstract class and implementation class |
| Date | Sun, 13 Aug 2017 09:37:48 -0000 (UTC) |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 15 |
| Message-ID | <slrnop07n8.o2q.avl@logic.at> (permalink) |
| References | <87r2wgxz2p.fsf@munus.decebal.nl> <omobrn$mvm$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| Reply-To | avl@logic.at |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Injection-Date | Sun, 13 Aug 2017 09:37:48 -0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="c9f2ba19e1c5daa470c6851ce1636ea3"; logging-data="14277"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/u2KLFM9/BOJizNbsesRj7" |
| User-Agent | slrn/1.0.2 (Linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:clmxuxMThqNGt00lgvJ/E3BKb7Q= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:37166 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> wrote: > I assume you are aware that with newer Java versions then > Class.forName is not required. I googled for "jdbc" and "forName", hoping that I'd find some with a negative context for "forName", but these still seem to be too well hidden (like e.g. on second result page)... Any hint for some more more successful google-terms for the new feature? I only remember, when having to call "registerDriver" finally came out of fashion - in favour of just "forName"ing the driver class.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is this a correct implementation of an abstract class and implementation class Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-08-12 23:20 +0200
Re: Is this a correct implementation of an abstract class and implementation class Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-08-12 22:00 -0400
Re: Is this a correct implementation of an abstract class and implementation class Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-08-13 07:14 +0200
Re: Is this a correct implementation of an abstract class and implementation class Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> - 2017-08-13 09:37 +0000
Re: Is this a correct implementation of an abstract class and implementation class Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> - 2017-08-13 10:13 +0000
Re: Is this a correct implementation of an abstract class and implementation class Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-08-13 16:27 -0400
Re: Is this a correct implementation of an abstract class and implementation class lewbloch@gmail.com - 2017-08-13 09:49 -0700
Re: Is this a correct implementation of an abstract class and implementation class Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-08-13 16:25 -0400
Re: Is this a correct implementation of an abstract class and implementation class Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-08-13 07:33 +0200
csiph-web