Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #36164

Re: can someone chk is this code ok and if i can make it better please state how

Show all headers | View raw

Possible improvements:
 - adding the missing close-brace for the class at the end.
 - There exist styling conventions for casing (upper/lower) of
     identifiers. Most of the identifiers are ok, except those
     for the fields. MixedCase with an initial capital should
     be used only for class-names.
 - Unless "the" is part of the field name, it shouldn't be
     included into accessor methods' names.

As for mutator methods: here's an example (assuming that the
fields have been renamed to lowercase initial):

...
     private int weight;
...
     public void setWeight(int weight)
     {
         this.weight = weight;
     }
...
     public int getWeight()
     {
         return weight;
     }
...
ditto for the other fields.


SuperGiirl <kainattshafiq90@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, January 6, 2017 at 8:38:28 PM UTC, SuperGiirl wrote:
>> public class Gadget
>> {
>>     private int Weight;
>>     private double Price;
>>     private String Model;
>>     private String Size; 
>> 
>>     
>>     public Gadget(int theWeight, double thePrice, String theModel, String theSize)
>>     {
>>       Weight = theWeight;
>>       Price = thePrice;
>>       Model = theModel;
>>       Size = theSize;
>>     }
>> 
>>     
>>     public int getTheWeight()
>>     {
>>         
>>         return Weight;
>>     }
>>     public double getThePrice()
>>     {
>>         return Price;
>>     }
>>     public String getTheModel()
>>     {
>>         return Model;
>>     }
>>     public String getTheSize()
>>     {
>>         return Size;
>>     }
>
> can someone please explain how to do the mutator method 

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

can someone chk is this code ok and if i can make it better please state how SuperGiirl <kainattshafiq90@gmail.com> - 2017-01-06 12:38 -0800
  Re: can someone chk is this code ok and if i can make it better please state how SuperGiirl <kainattshafiq90@gmail.com> - 2017-01-06 12:52 -0800
    Re: can someone chk is this code ok and if i can make it better please state how Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> - 2017-01-06 21:11 +0000
      Re: can someone chk is this code ok and if i can make it better please state how SuperGiirl <kainattshafiq90@gmail.com> - 2017-01-06 14:02 -0800
  Re: can someone chk is this code ok and if i can make it better please state how Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2017-01-06 16:15 -0500
    Re: can someone chk is this code ok and if i can make it better please state how Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2017-01-07 14:16 +0100
  Re: can someone chk is this code ok and if i can make it better please state how lewbloch@gmail.com - 2017-01-06 17:23 -0800
  Re: can someone chk is this code ok and if i can make it better please state how Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2017-01-07 14:23 +0100
  Re: can someone chk is this code ok and if i can make it better please state how galt_57@hotmail.com - 2017-01-07 11:39 -0800

csiph-web