Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #35515
| From | Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Why not String compare? |
| Date | 2016-08-31 09:45 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <slrnnsd9q3.456.avl@login.logic.tuwien.ac.at> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <e2ba8jF67mfU1@mid.individual.net> <1c9ad1a1-ee44-4a9f-a307-1dab14c4a921@googlegroups.com> <e2bo9iF9m4nU1@mid.individual.net> <d9d392a6-7361-4743-aaef-22ec3d126722@googlegroups.com> <e2nb40F26seU1@mid.individual.net> |
Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> wrote: > The implementor must ensure sgn(x.compareTo(y)) == -sgn(y.compareTo(x)) > for all x and y. (This implies that x.compareTo(y) must throw an > exception iff y.compareTo(x) throws an exception.) An equivalent "symmetry" could be expected from .equals, but isn't. It's not "symmetry" as such, that implied the requirement. It was just pragmatically defined so for .compareTo while not for .equals. Any usecase for including null into the natural ordering of certain Comparable objects is just flawed.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why not String compare? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 09:00 -0700
Re: Why not String compare? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2016-08-26 18:49 +0200
Re: Why not String compare? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 10:09 -0700
Re: Why not String compare? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2016-08-26 22:48 +0200
Re: Why not String compare? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 13:55 -0700
Re: Why not String compare? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-08-26 17:29 -0400
Re: Why not String compare? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2016-08-30 22:20 -0700
Re: Why not String compare? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2016-08-31 08:17 +0200
Re: Why not String compare? Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> - 2016-08-31 09:45 +0000
Re: Why not String compare? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2016-08-31 19:24 +0200
Re: Why not String compare? Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> - 2016-09-01 10:17 +0000
Re: Why not String compare? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2016-09-02 18:29 +0200
Re: Why not String compare? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-08-26 13:24 -0400
Re: Why not String compare? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 10:48 -0700
Re: Why not String compare? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-08-26 14:50 -0400
Re: Why not String compare? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 12:19 -0700
Re: Why not String compare? Lothar Kimmeringer <news200709@kimmeringer.de> - 2016-09-01 20:42 +0200
Re: Why not String compare? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-09-01 17:57 -0400
Re: Why not String compare? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 11:03 -0700
Re: Why not String compare? Lothar Kimmeringer <news200709@kimmeringer.de> - 2016-09-02 21:54 +0200
csiph-web