Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #31427
| From | Fredrik Jonson <fredrik@jonson.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Is it legal to backport code from JDK8 to JDK6? |
| Date | 2015-03-31 15:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnmhlh1k.l2c.fredrik@biggles.jonson.org> (permalink) |
| References | <a296b442-cdae-4283-9383-52a7712d9e8b@googlegroups.com> <mfc38r$al3$1@dont-email.me> |
In <mfc38r$al3$1@dont-email.me> Eric Sosman wrote: > On 3/30/2015 7:37 AM, Haddock wrote: > > > > JDK8 has some new class LinkedTransferQueue [...] I would like to backport > > [it] to JDK6. My question is whether there could be any legal problem with > > that [?] > > [...] So: The source file both claims and disclaims proprietary rights, and > the Creative Commons page doesn't seem to resolve the matter. However, I > (never having practiced law, nor attended law school, nor even taken the > LSAT) am confident you'll have no trouble. Haddock, I'm curious, which open source project are you working on? Many open source software organizations have dedicated mailing lists with volunteers that are specialized on licensing questions. While you wont get proper legal advice by lawyers there either, they are more intimate with what's involved. You could try asking on those lists. https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/ https://www.apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html#foundation-legal Eric, I found what I believe is the corresponding source code file in the openjdk8 mercurial repository. And there I could not see any extra "Oracle proprietary" licensing header. Only the default GPL plus Classpath exception. That at least avoids the contradictory "oracle proprietary" vs GPL aspect of the source code file in the Oracle JDK. http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/file/9e9f5713b26d/src/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/LinkedTransferQueue.java http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/file/9e9f5713b26d/LICENSE By the way, Haddoc, why not check "java.version" and use LinkedTransferQueue on the runtimes where that is available and the less performant LinkedQueue on the older platforms? That way you can avoid any legal conundrums and optimize for non-legacy platforms. -- Fredrik Jonson
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is it legal to backport code from JDK8 to JDK6? Haddock <ffm2002@web.de> - 2015-03-30 04:37 -0700
Re: Is it legal to backport code from JDK8 to JDK6? Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2015-03-30 10:04 -0400
Re: Is it legal to backport code from JDK8 to JDK6? Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2015-03-30 18:43 +0200
Re: Is it legal to backport code from JDK8 to JDK6? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2015-03-30 14:06 -0400
Re: Is it legal to backport code from JDK8 to JDK6? Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2015-03-30 20:37 +0200
Re: Is it legal to backport code from JDK8 to JDK6? Fredrik Jonson <fredrik@jonson.org> - 2015-03-31 15:58 +0000
Re: Is it legal to backport code from JDK8 to JDK6? Sebastian <news@seyweiler.dyndns.org> - 2015-03-30 20:47 +0200
Re: Is it legal to backport code from JDK8 to JDK6? Fredrik Jonson <fredrik@jonson.org> - 2015-03-31 16:20 +0000
Re: Is it legal to backport code from JDK8 to JDK6? Sebastian <news@seyweiler.dyndns.org> - 2015-03-31 23:02 +0200
Re: Is it legal to backport code from JDK8 to JDK6? Haddock <ffm2002@web.de> - 2015-04-01 11:33 -0700
csiph-web