Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #27723
| From | Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: [opinion] javac's default stack space |
| Date | 2014-03-11 14:16 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <slrnlhu6ls.rhr.avl@login.logic.tuwien.ac.at> (permalink) |
| References | <slrnlhoufj.rhr.avl@login.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <531e650b$0$298$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> |
Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> wrote: > On 3/9/2014 10:25 AM, Andreas Leitgeb wrote: >> I recently got some Java sources that caused "javac" on >> my machine (Linux, Java 1.7, 32bit) to run out of stack >> space, while compiling fine on AIX, Java 1.7, 64bit. > What Java vendor? > AIX must be IBM Java. > But Linux could be IBM, Oracle or OpenJDK. The Java on my linux machine is definitely from Oracle, because the (dated)system's Java was 1.6, and I downloaded and installed Java 1.7 manually from Oracle and call javac by its full path name. >> I then played with option -J-Xss# and a couple of values >> for #, and found that up to about 350k it busted, while >> with 360k or more it compiled just fine. My actual problem >> is thus solved, but now I'm wondering... >> Has anyone else run into javac's default stack size limit? > No. Does your "No" apply specifically to Oracle's 1.7 *32bit* command-line tool "javac"? ... and *not* to eclipse, ant, or any other suite that likely has its own separate and likely larger default stack size? >> Does anyone else have any insight about what features of >> Java sources are likely culprits for stack usage peaks? > It does not make any sense to me. The Stack-overflows (before I added -J-Xss1m) may not make sense, but they were a fact. Another fact is, that not all facts necessarily make sense, though...
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[opinion] javac's default stack space Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2014-03-09 14:25 +0000
Re: [opinion] javac's default stack space Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2014-03-10 18:33 +0100
Re: [opinion] javac's default stack space Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2014-03-10 21:02 +0000
Re: [opinion] javac's default stack space Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2014-03-11 23:19 +0100
Re: [opinion] javac's default stack space "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2014-03-11 19:56 +0000
Re: [opinion] javac's default stack space Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2014-03-12 00:53 +0000
Re: [opinion] javac's default stack space Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2014-03-23 20:37 +0000
Re: [opinion] javac's default stack space Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-03-10 21:21 -0400
Re: [opinion] javac's default stack space Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2014-03-11 14:16 +0000
Re: [opinion] javac's default stack space Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-03-11 18:05 -0400
Re: [opinion] javac's default stack space Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2014-03-11 23:22 +0100
Re: [opinion] javac's default stack space Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-03-11 19:50 -0400
csiph-web