Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #39623
| From | Wayne <wayne@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Java Overloading rules confusion |
| Date | 2020-10-09 22:51 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <rlr7ju$qcg$3@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <rloivp$k46$1@dont-email.me> <rlpqcl$gk8$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
On 10/9/2020 9:59 AM, Arne Vajhøj wrote: > ... > But I would like to point out the obvious: the first code > may compile, but it is still bad code. > > Code where the reader needs to remember some subtle > language rules to understand why the code does what > it does is bad code. > > Arne I agree. I was trying to post a minimal example that shows the issue. It is indeed poor code for any real project. -- Wayne
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Java Overloading rules confusion Wayne <wayne@nospam.invalid> - 2020-10-08 22:47 -0400
Re: Java Overloading rules confusion Marcel Mueller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2020-10-09 09:01 +0200
Re: Java Overloading rules confusion Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2020-10-09 09:21 -0400
Re: Java Overloading rules confusion Wayne <wayne@nospam.invalid> - 2020-10-09 22:51 -0400
Re: Java Overloading rules confusion Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2020-10-09 09:59 -0400
Re: Java Overloading rules confusion Wayne <wayne@nospam.invalid> - 2020-10-09 22:51 -0400
csiph-web