Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #39450
| From | Jeff Higgins <invalid@invalid.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Character.isIdentifierIgnorable |
| Date | 2020-04-25 13:39 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <r81sls$lj1$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <r800o5$fga$1@dont-email.me> <r80703$peb$1@gioia.aioe.org> <r80b7t$1us$1@dont-email.me> <r81q59$1r7i$2@gioia.aioe.org> <r81qd3$1np$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
On 4/25/20 1:01 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote: > On 4/25/2020 12:57 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote: >> On 4/24/2020 11:36 PM, Jeff Higgins wrote: >>> On 4/24/20 10:24 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote: >>>> On 4/24/2020 8:37 PM, Jeff Higgins wrote: >>>>> On 4/24/20 8:29 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote: >>>>>> I think we are in the far out corners of the language. >>>>>> >>>>> Well, yeah, but still. >>>>> And still leaves me questioning motivation for ignorable chars. >>>> >>>> We would need to find someone working at SUN back in the mid 90's >>>> to know. >>>> >>>> If I were to guess then somebody got the "smart" idea that >>>> the language should not distinguish between names where >>>> the difference could not be seen when type'd/cat'ed and >>>> then someone else later added the \uXXXX feature. >>>> >>> Maybe not that far back. >>> >>> from JLS-3.8 for JavaSE 9 >>> Two identifiers are the same only if they are identical, that is, >>> have the same >>> Unicode character for each letter or digit. Identifiers that have the >>> same external >>> appearance may yet be different. >>> >>> from JLS-3.8 for JavaSE 10 >>> Two identifiers are the same only if, after ignoring characters that are >>> ignorable, the identifiers have the same Unicode character for each >>> letter >>> or digit. An ignorable character is a character for which the method >>> Character.isIdentifierIgnorable(int) returns true. Identifiers that >>> have the >>> same external appearance may yet be different. >> >> But Java 8 javac did ignore them?? > > So does Java 7 javac. > > Java 6 javac gives me an error when trying to create the class file, > which likely means that it is not ignoring these characters. > Thanks. I don't have earlier than 8 easily available. Was wondering. I was wondering when Character,isIdentifierIgnorable(int codepoint) became available. The earliest javadoc that i can find is 5 and is available there. A Sun press release from 1997 features "Global language support based on Unicode 2.0 standards" so maybe available from then?
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Character.isIdentifierIgnorable Jeff Higgins <invalid@invalid.org> - 2020-04-24 18:46 -0400
Re: Character.isIdentifierIgnorable Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2020-04-24 18:54 -0400
Re: Character.isIdentifierIgnorable Martin Gregorie <martin@mydomain.invalid> - 2020-04-24 23:07 +0000
Re: Character.isIdentifierIgnorable Jeff Higgins <invalid@invalid.org> - 2020-04-24 20:12 -0400
Re: Character.isIdentifierIgnorable Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2020-04-24 20:29 -0400
Re: Character.isIdentifierIgnorable Jeff Higgins <invalid@invalid.org> - 2020-04-24 20:37 -0400
Re: Character.isIdentifierIgnorable Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2020-04-24 22:24 -0400
Re: Character.isIdentifierIgnorable Jeff Higgins <invalid@invalid.org> - 2020-04-24 23:36 -0400
Re: Character.isIdentifierIgnorable Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2020-04-25 12:57 -0400
Re: Character.isIdentifierIgnorable Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2020-04-25 13:01 -0400
Re: Character.isIdentifierIgnorable Jeff Higgins <invalid@invalid.org> - 2020-04-25 13:39 -0400
Re: Character.isIdentifierIgnorable Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2020-04-25 13:51 -0400
Re: Character.isIdentifierIgnorable Jeff Higgins <invalid@invalid.org> - 2020-04-25 14:36 -0400
Re: Character.isIdentifierIgnorable Jeff Higgins <invalid@invalid.org> - 2020-04-24 23:41 -0400
Re: Character.isIdentifierIgnorable Jeff Higgins <invalid@invalid.org> - 2020-04-24 20:25 -0400
Re: Character.isIdentifierIgnorable Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2020-04-24 20:32 -0400
Re: Character.isIdentifierIgnorable Jeff Higgins <invalid@invalid.org> - 2020-04-24 20:42 -0400
Re: Character.isIdentifierIgnorable Jeff Higgins <invalid@invalid.org> - 2020-04-25 09:53 -0400
Re: Character.isIdentifierIgnorable Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2020-04-25 12:55 -0400
Re: Character.isIdentifierIgnorable Jeff Higgins <invalid@invalid.org> - 2020-04-25 13:43 -0400
csiph-web