Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #38353
| From | Martin Gregorie <martin@mydomain.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Can Java compute 9^(9^9) ? |
| Date | 2018-06-10 09:13 +0000 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <pfiq32$ip5$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | <b40df5be-1946-4483-ad04-9b8b87a40195@googlegroups.com> <pfh8fd$pk$1@news.albasani.net> <pfhnth$jv5$1@Gaia.teknon.de> |
On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 23:29:53 +0000, Volker Borchert wrote: > j4n bur53 wrote: > >> Interestingly IBM, also for their new POWER9, >> still provides BCD coding support. > > Is it part of ANSI COBOL? > Its been a long time since I wrote any COBOL, and I've never done so on IBM kit [only ICL 1900 (24bit word, 6bit char), ICL 2900 (byte-oriented), DEC VAX, Tandem and NCR UNIX (Intel chips)] and AFAIK none of these machines supported BCD arithmetic at the hardware level. COBOL specifies a number of numeric representations which include COMP (fixed length numeric strings), DISPLAY (formatted character strings) COMP SYNC (native binary representations) and a few others (COMP-n) including floating point. I think you'll find that the internal representation of COMP variables is undefined by the standard as long as manipulating it works to the CODSASYL rules. I've looked at COBOL crash dumps on most of these systems and don't recall any of them using some form of non-native numeric storage, i.e. if you could read the assembler, the data division of the COBOL dump was understandable. -- Martin | martin at Gregorie | gregorie dot org
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Can Java compute 9^(9^9) ? bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-06-01 10:20 -0700
Re: Can Java compute 9^(9^9) ? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2018-06-01 13:36 -0400
Re: Can Java compute 9^(9^9) ? j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2018-06-01 20:20 +0200
Re: Can Java compute 9^(9^9) ? bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-06-05 07:17 -0700
Re: Can Java compute 9^(9^9) ? bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-06-05 07:29 -0700
Re: Can Java compute 9^(9^9) ? bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-06-05 07:48 -0700
Re: Can Java compute 9^(9^9) ? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2018-06-05 10:57 -0400
Re: Can Java compute 9^(9^9) ? bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-06-05 09:32 -0700
Re: Can Java compute 9^(9^9) ? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2018-06-05 13:58 -0400
Re: Can Java compute 9^(9^9) ? bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-06-05 11:10 -0700
Re: Can Java compute 9^(9^9) ? bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-06-05 11:21 -0700
Re: Can Java compute 9^(9^9) ? Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> - 2018-06-06 08:50 +0000
Re: Can Java compute 9^(9^9) ? bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-06-06 01:58 -0700
Re: Can Java compute 9^(9^9) ? bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-06-06 02:01 -0700
Re: Can Java compute 9^(9^9) ? bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-06-06 10:34 -0700
Re: Can Java compute 9^(9^9) ? j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2018-06-09 21:06 +0200
Re: Can Java compute 9^(9^9) ? v_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert) - 2018-06-09 23:29 +0000
Re: Can Java compute 9^(9^9) ? Martin Gregorie <martin@mydomain.invalid> - 2018-06-10 09:13 +0000
Re: Can Java compute 9^(9^9) ? bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-06-10 02:31 -0700
Re: Can Java compute 9^(9^9) ? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2018-06-10 18:28 -0400
Re: Can Java compute 9^(9^9) ? bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-06-10 15:48 -0700
Re: Can Java compute 9^(9^9) ? bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-06-10 15:52 -0700
Re: Can Java compute 9^(9^9) ? bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-06-10 15:58 -0700
Re: Can Java compute 9^(9^9) ? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2018-06-10 21:17 -0400
Re: Can Java compute 9^(9^9) ? bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-06-11 13:20 -0700
Re: Can Java compute 9^(9^9) ? bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-06-14 13:37 -0700
csiph-web