Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #37897

Guice vs plain singleton

Path	csiph.com!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Guice vs plain singleton
Date	Wed, 20 Dec 2017 18:19:59 +0200
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines	15
Message-ID	<p1e2jv$1jmk$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
NNTP-Posting-Host	D3/YnGGc1x0ohCom0dypDQ.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7Bit
X-Complaints-To	abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent	KNode/4.14.10
X-Notice	Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:37897

Show key headers only | View raw

What should I prefer for creating a singleton object with "heavy" (requiring 
much CPU time or like this) constructor:

- Guice @Singleton injector

or 

- plain hand-made singleton like 

static Type instance; ... if(instance==null) ...

?

-- 
Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Guice vs plain singleton Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru> - 2017-12-20 18:19 +0200
  Re: Guice vs plain singleton Patrick Roemer <sangamon@netcologne.de> - 2017-12-20 17:53 +0100
    Re: Guice vs plain singleton Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte.net> - 2017-12-21 13:59 +0100
      Re: Guice vs plain singleton lewbloch@gmail.com - 2017-12-21 11:36 -0800
        Re: Guice vs plain singleton Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-12-22 20:11 -0500
          Re: Guice vs plain singleton Sebastian <nowhere@nirvana.org> - 2017-12-23 16:15 +0100
            Re: Guice vs plain singleton lewbloch@gmail.com - 2017-12-23 09:54 -0800
              Re: Guice vs plain singleton Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-12-23 19:27 -0500

csiph-web