Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #37528
| From | Knute Johnson <nospam@rabbitbrush.frazmtn.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Problem compiling with 9 for 8 |
| Date | 2017-10-03 10:32 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <or0ai2$qm7$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <oqu9tn$10e$1@dont-email.me> <oquj4l$1mk4$1@gioia.aioe.org> <oquk56$1nob$1@gioia.aioe.org> <oqukls$1oh2$1@gioia.aioe.org> <oqulbl$1pcp$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
On 10/2/2017 19:24, Arne Vajhøj wrote: > On 10/2/2017 8:12 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote: >> But I was wrong about the implementation. >> >> It does not use the old rt.jar. >> >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8058150 >> >> <quote> >> For JDK N and --release M, M < N, signature data of the documented >> APIs of release M of the platform is needed. This data is stored in >> the $JDK_ROOT/lib/ct.sym file, which is similar, but not the same, as >> the file of the same name in JDK 8. The ct.sym file is a ZIP file >> containing stripped-down class files corresponding to class files from >> the target platform versions. >> </quote> >> >> So --release should work without the old rt.jar, but zipinfo on >> ct.sym reveals that JavaFX is not included in it. >> >> So therefore an actual old jfxrt.jar is needed. > > Some googling reveals that ct.sym was introduced as far > back as Java 6. > > Arne > Well that explains why some of my other programs didn't have that problem when I compiled them with --release 8. Thanks for figuring that out for me. Next I have to figure out this whole module thing. -- Knute Johnson
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Problem compiling with 9 for 8 Knute Johnson <nospam@rabbitbrush.frazmtn.com> - 2017-10-02 10:51 -0500
Re: Problem compiling with 9 for 8 Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-10-02 14:25 -0400
Re: Problem compiling with 9 for 8 Knute Johnson <nospam@rabbitbrush.frazmtn.com> - 2017-10-02 14:49 -0500
Re: Problem compiling with 9 for 8 Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-10-02 16:10 -0400
Re: Problem compiling with 9 for 8 Knute Johnson <nospam@rabbitbrush.frazmtn.com> - 2017-10-02 16:08 -0500
Re: Problem compiling with 9 for 8 Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-10-02 19:46 -0400
Re: Problem compiling with 9 for 8 Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-10-02 20:03 -0400
Re: Problem compiling with 9 for 8 Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-10-02 20:12 -0400
Re: Problem compiling with 9 for 8 Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-10-02 20:24 -0400
Re: Problem compiling with 9 for 8 Knute Johnson <nospam@rabbitbrush.frazmtn.com> - 2017-10-03 10:32 -0500
Re: Problem compiling with 9 for 8 Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-10-03 20:48 -0400
Re: Problem compiling with 9 for 8 Knute Johnson <nospam@rabbitbrush.frazmtn.com> - 2017-10-04 17:27 -0500
csiph-web