Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #37196
| Path | csiph.com!news.redatomik.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Is this a correct implementation of an abstract class and implementation class |
| Date | Sun, 13 Aug 2017 16:27:44 -0400 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Lines | 35 |
| Message-ID | <omqcnu$1j6h$2@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <87r2wgxz2p.fsf@munus.decebal.nl> <omobrn$mvm$1@gioia.aioe.org> <slrnop07n8.o2q.avl@logic.at> <slrnop09p8.o2q.avl@logic.at> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 5VufzpQaY1AiVRqLF21lbg.user.gioia.aioe.org |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@aioe.org |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 |
| X-Notice | Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:37196 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 8/13/2017 6:13 AM, Andreas Leitgeb wrote: > Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> wrote: >> Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> wrote: >>> I assume you are aware that with newer Java versions then >>> Class.forName is not required. >> I googled for "jdbc" and "forName", hoping that I'd find some with >> a negative context for "forName", but these still seem to be too >> well hidden... > > Well, found it, afterall, but I'm not overly impressed. > iiuc, then instead of providing the driver class name and > the dbURI for an app, I'd instead provide the dbURI to > the app, and need to provide the used drivername(s) already > to the JVM. ???? Before: Class.forName DriverManager.getConnection After: DriverManager.getConnection From 2 lines to 1 line. There are corner cases with drivers not supporting service model, having two drivers for the same URL etc., but in 99% of cases you just drop the Class.forName and it works. Arne
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is this a correct implementation of an abstract class and implementation class Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-08-12 23:20 +0200
Re: Is this a correct implementation of an abstract class and implementation class Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-08-12 22:00 -0400
Re: Is this a correct implementation of an abstract class and implementation class Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-08-13 07:14 +0200
Re: Is this a correct implementation of an abstract class and implementation class Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> - 2017-08-13 09:37 +0000
Re: Is this a correct implementation of an abstract class and implementation class Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> - 2017-08-13 10:13 +0000
Re: Is this a correct implementation of an abstract class and implementation class Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-08-13 16:27 -0400
Re: Is this a correct implementation of an abstract class and implementation class lewbloch@gmail.com - 2017-08-13 09:49 -0700
Re: Is this a correct implementation of an abstract class and implementation class Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-08-13 16:25 -0400
Re: Is this a correct implementation of an abstract class and implementation class Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-08-13 07:33 +0200
csiph-web