Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #37038

Re: Outdated and license-violating Java code snippets on Stack Overflow

Show all headers | View raw

On 7/31/2017 8:11 AM, Eric Douglas wrote:
> On Saturday, July 29, 2017 at 8:30:00 AM UTC-4, crag...@gmail.com wrote:

>> 3) Stack Overflow applies CC BY-SA 3.0 license to both text and
>> code snippets on the posts. The CC BY-SA 3.0 is quite permissive.
>> So, for example, if I copy a code snippet from an open source
>> project that has GPL license but I do not include the original
>> license in the copied snippet, this snippet may appear to be
>> protected by CC BY-SA 3.0 instead of its original GPL license. We
>> have performed another study using code clone detection tools to
>> detect SO snippets that were copied from 111 open source projects.
>> We found at least 357 of them violate their original licenses.
> Doesn't the GPL license say anyone is free to copy their code and use
> in house?  Anyone who cares about license violations likely already
> has an army of lawyers searching for violations, and anyone using an
> open license isn't going to care unless someone is putting it in code
> they're selling.  All the code I've written is only used for the
> company's own internal application.
Using GPL code for inhouse only is rather unproblematic.

But using GPL embedded in something distributed to external
entities comes with certain obligations.

SO snippets may also be used in the latter case.

GPL license does not prevent the user of the code from
selling the resulting product for money - they just need
to comply with the GPL license.

And FSF do enforce GPL terms in general.

But I suspect they may not try and enforce it for a single
code snippet.

Arne

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Outdated and license-violating Java code snippets on Stack Overflow cragkhit@gmail.com - 2017-07-26 14:50 -0700
  Re: Outdated and license-violating Java code snippets on Stack Overflow j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2017-07-27 16:20 +0200
    Re: Outdated and license-violating Java code snippets on Stack Overflow Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 08:10 -0700
      Re: Outdated and license-violating Java code snippets on Stack Overflow cragkhit@gmail.com - 2017-07-29 05:29 -0700
        Re: Outdated and license-violating Java code snippets on Stack Overflow "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-07-29 05:57 -0700
        Re: Outdated and license-violating Java code snippets on Stack Overflow Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-07-29 18:35 -0400
        Re: Outdated and license-violating Java code snippets on Stack Overflow Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 05:11 -0700
          Re: Outdated and license-violating Java code snippets on Stack Overflow Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-07-31 19:12 -0400
    Re: Outdated and license-violating Java code snippets on Stack Overflow Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2017-07-27 20:13 -0400
      Re: Outdated and license-violating Java code snippets on Stack Overflow cragkhit@gmail.com - 2017-07-29 05:31 -0700
    Re: Outdated and license-violating Java code snippets on Stack Overflow cragkhit@gmail.com - 2017-07-29 05:19 -0700
      Re: Outdated and license-violating Java code snippets on Stack Overflow "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-07-29 05:30 -0700

csiph-web