Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #36992
| From | Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: null checks |
| Date | 2017-07-25 12:12 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <ol7ck1$kjf$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <70f5af57-8dc0-416c-b2aa-0bbbb47fc7b5@googlegroups.com> <ojobsn$rh8$1@gioia.aioe.org> <wj8y35fwauls$.t07pxjfiv3wa.dlg@40tude.net> <ojri0j$j6$1@dont-email.me> <g4p7rs4na7kl$.1li01503lxx7y.dlg@40tude.net> |
On Tue, 25 Jul 2017 07:26:39 +0200, Joerg Meier wrote: > But we are literally discussing a tool/specification here that makes it > possible to do exactly that. I get not wanting to rely on it*, but it's > weird to argue that this tool basically doesn't exist. Null checks can > easily be done at compile time by using these tools. > As I said earlier, I was writing C long before I started using Java and am still writing quite a bit of C: which language I use depends on the sort of task and what the target hardware is [*]. Of course YMMV, but it makes sense for me to make these checks explicit in Java because that's what I'm used to doing in C. [*] I considered writing an 8-bit emulator in Java. Some parts, including configurable modularity, would have been really easy in Java, but making 8 bit register handling (which required 8 bit unsigned arithmetic plus a setting the CC register on overflow, whether bit 0 was set, etc,etc turned out to be much easier in C. OTOH a tool for setting up a set of club duty rosters was a breeze in Java and would have been bad news in C. -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org |
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
null checks Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 08:03 -0700
Re: null checks Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-07-07 11:49 -0400
Re: null checks Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 08:54 -0700
Re: null checks Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-07-07 12:12 -0400
Re: null checks Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 10:16 -0700
Re: null checks Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2017-07-08 22:33 +0200
Re: null checks Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2017-07-08 21:14 +0000
Re: null checks Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2017-07-08 17:51 -0400
Re: null checks Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2017-07-08 22:26 +0000
Re: null checks Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-07-08 18:28 -0400
Re: null checks Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2017-07-25 07:26 +0200
Re: null checks Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2017-07-25 12:12 +0000
Re: null checks Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-07-08 18:20 -0400
Re: null checks Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-07-10 05:35 -0700
Re: null checks Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2017-07-09 13:10 +0200
Re: null checks Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2017-07-07 12:53 -0400
Re: null checks lewbloch@gmail.com - 2017-07-26 11:16 -0700
Re: null checks Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-07-26 11:40 -0700
Re: null checks Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2017-07-26 16:40 -0400
Re: null checks lewbloch@gmail.com - 2017-07-28 18:47 -0700
Re: null checks Wayne <wayne@nospam.invalid> - 2017-07-07 16:24 -0400
Re: null checks Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2017-07-08 22:32 +0200
Re: null checks Lothar Kimmeringer <news201705@kimmeringer.de> - 2017-07-09 15:59 +0200
Re: null checks Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-07-11 20:30 -0400
csiph-web