Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #36738
| From | Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: JDK vs JRE |
| Date | 2017-06-26 19:21 -0400 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <ois4sr$sr1$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <79f5f306-f1fc-4923-83d7-f0fa5128de29@googlegroups.com> |
On 6/26/2017 3:22 PM, Eric Douglas wrote: > I tried searching for differences and all I'm seeing is the obvious, > the JDK contains the JRE plus the development tools. Other than a > somewhat larger footprint, is there any harm in end users who only > need a JRE installing a JDK? If you by end users mean normal desktop PC's, then I don't see any particular good reasons for not to install JDK. The extra MB's is insignificant by todays standard. Servers are different. Your company may very likely prohibit all development tools on production servers to control what software is there. Arne
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
JDK vs JRE Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-06-26 12:22 -0700 Re: JDK vs JRE Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2017-06-26 20:50 +0000 Re: JDK vs JRE Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-06-26 19:21 -0400 Re: JDK vs JRE lewbloch@gmail.com - 2017-06-27 12:35 -0700
csiph-web