Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #36536
| From | Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Generics and downcasts |
| Date | 2017-04-25 19:54 -0400 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <odonjn$1h56$2@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <generics-20170424231405@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <odoaaj$9q$1@gwaiyur.mb-net.net> <odob39$s00$1@gioia.aioe.org> <90e70a8b-5e6d-45cc-a42d-976b2dec543e@googlegroups.com> |
On 4/25/2017 4:35 PM, Eric Douglas wrote: > On Tuesday, April 25, 2017 at 4:21:08 PM UTC-4, Arne Vajhøj wrote: >> <quote> Like many myths about Java performance, the erroneous >> belief that declaring classes or methods as final results in better >> performance is widely held but rarely examined. The argument goes >> that declaring a method or class as final means that the compiler >> can inline method calls more aggressively, because it knows that at >> run time this is definitely the version of the method that's going >> to be called. But this is simply not true. Just because class X is >> compiled against final class Y doesn't mean that the same version >> of class Y will be loaded at run time. So the compiler cannot >> inline such cross-class method calls safely, final or not. Only if >> a method is private can the compiler inline it freely, and in that >> case, the final keyword would be redundant. </quote> > > Eclipse Cleanup adds final modifiers all over the place. I don't > recall if these are supposed to help performance. All I know is 3 of > the purposes for final. 1) declaring a public, usually static > constant variable 2) declaring a class that should never be extended > and 3) declaring a variable in a class that needs to pass directly > into something, like a SwingWorker. There are reasons to use final. Just not performance optimization. Arne
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Generics and downcasts Marcel Mueller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2017-04-25 22:07 +0200
Re: Generics and downcasts Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-04-25 16:20 -0400
Re: Generics and downcasts Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-25 13:35 -0700
Re: Generics and downcasts Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-04-25 19:54 -0400
Re: Generics and downcasts Marcel Mueller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2017-04-25 22:40 +0200
Re: Generics and downcasts Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2017-04-25 18:13 -0400
Re: Generics and downcasts Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-04-25 19:53 -0400
csiph-web