Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #35879

Re: Parameterized Factory with additional parameter requires new interface?

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: Parameterized Factory with additional parameter requires new interface?
Date	Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:43:56 -0400
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	11
Message-ID	<nv0d9l$ld0$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<d1c8beb2-3ef7-4965-afa0-4cb0902c02fb@googlegroups.com> <nuvj57$gus$1@newsreader4.netcologne.de> <nuvprg$5jd$1@dont-email.me> <nuvt3j$bks$1@news.albasani.net>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Injection-Date	Fri, 28 Oct 2016 20:43:33 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info	mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="eba2875249e1f2a483e6a6056f04352b"; logging-data="21920"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/4AUYxcscTpthEUNuBCd/h"
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
In-Reply-To	<nuvt3j$bks$1@news.albasani.net>
Cancel-Lock	sha1:U8lzYmB27pR7rJJDNM6Oaj6lLds=
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:35879

Show key headers only | View raw

On 10/28/2016 12:07 PM, j4n bur53 wrote:
> Eric Sosman schrieb:

No, I can't take the credit: Patrick Roemer schrieb.

>> XXXresource res = ...
>> [...]

-- 
esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid
"Don't be afraid of work. Make work afraid of you." -- TLM

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Parameterized Factory with additional parameter requires new interface? mike <mikaelpetterson@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-27 23:51 -0700
  Re: Parameterized Factory with additional parameter requires new interface? j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-28 10:27 +0200
  Re: Parameterized Factory with additional parameter requires new interface? Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> - 2016-10-28 11:59 +0000
  Re: Parameterized Factory with additional parameter requires new interface? Patrick Roemer <sangamon@netcologne.de> - 2016-10-28 15:17 +0200
    Re: Parameterized Factory with additional parameter requires new interface? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-10-28 11:12 -0400
      Re: Parameterized Factory with additional parameter requires new interface? j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-28 18:07 +0200
        Re: Parameterized Factory with additional parameter requires new interface? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-10-28 16:43 -0400

csiph-web