Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #35835

Re: new JDK 1.8.0_112

Path	csiph.com!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: new JDK 1.8.0_112
Date	Wed, 19 Oct 2016 21:26:07 -0400
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines	24
Message-ID	<nu96fg$egc$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<d68d0c9ub7i9gc66m8p3sduv44nbvpmhn1@4ax.com> <801e31b0-8a86-4276-952c-45c44a0d5d81@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host	PBuS014lhzVyHjLbXmo/ZQ.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Complaints-To	abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
X-Notice	Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:35835

Show key headers only | View raw

On 10/19/2016 8:03 AM, Eric Douglas wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 18, 2016 at 6:24:23 PM UTC-4, Roedy Green wrote:
>> JDK 1.8.0_111 and 1.8.0_112 are out.
>
> 111 and 112?  Which one works?  Last update there was a 101 and 102
> and we had problems with 102.  So I guess we stick with 111, even
> though when we fixed the rest of the machines on our network by
> removing 102 and installing 101 I just put 122 on my machine which
> seems to be working fine. So, 111, or early release is at least up to
> 122...

I think this topic has come up so many times recently.

111 = 102 + security fixes
112 = 102 + security fixes + other fixes

So I think the logical upgrade strategy is:

101 or 102 works and want to minimize risk => pick 111
want latest and greatest => pick 112
101 works, 102 does not work and bug not fixed in 111/112 => stay at 101

Arne

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

new JDK 1.8.0_112 Roedy Green <inquiry@mindprod.com> - 2016-10-18 15:24 -0700
  Re: new JDK 1.8.0_112 Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 05:03 -0700
    Re: new JDK 1.8.0_112 Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-10-19 08:20 -0400
      Re: new JDK 1.8.0_112 Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 05:33 -0700
        Re: new JDK 1.8.0_112 Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-10-19 09:28 -0400
          Re: new JDK 1.8.0_112 Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 07:14 -0700
    Re: new JDK 1.8.0_112 Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-19 21:26 -0400

csiph-web