Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #35667

Re: Java is faster!

Path csiph.com!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Java is faster!
Date Thu, 29 Sep 2016 21:17:39 -0400
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines 22
Message-ID <nskefg$1eso$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <faster-20160923143035@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host PBuS014lhzVyHjLbXmo/ZQ.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Complaints-To abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0
X-Notice Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:35667

Show key headers only | View raw


On 9/23/2016 9:31 AM, Stefan Ram wrote:
>       "Java is faster!
>       In terms of throughput in a long running system ...
>       For specific applications ...
>       On a well tuned JVM ...
>       With near-optimal GC strategy selected ..."
>
>   says Chandler Carruth, one of Google's C++ experts. (JFTR)

Java JIT and GC are pretty good today.

No surprise that it is faster "For specific applications".

There are probably also some other specific applications where
C++ are faster.

The real point is that throughput is not a decisive
factor in picking the language.

Arne

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-09-29 21:17 -0400
  Re: Java is faster! Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-09-29 22:23 -0400
    Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-01 11:17 -0400
      Re: Java is faster! Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-10-01 12:54 -0400

csiph-web