Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #34790
| From | Daniel Pitts <usenet@coloraura.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Is it necessary to have both an application server AND a web server? |
| Date | 2016-07-08 08:31 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <nloh13$aq9$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <njfg37$1hj0$1@gioia.aioe.org> <njsfhf$2hu$1@gioia.aioe.org> <nln3ad$1mrg$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
On 7/7/16 7:31 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote: > On 6/15/2016 4:58 PM, Qu0ll wrote: >> On 11/06/2016 08:48, Qu0ll wrote: >>> DISCLAIMER: Server-side Java is not my forte. >>> >>> I have often noticed that in many places where I have worked, the >>> companies have both a full application server such as JBoss/Wildfly AND >>> a web server (typically Apache) installed and both seem to work >>> together. >>> >>> 1) Is this necessary and if so, why? >>> 2) What does a web server "provide" that an application server doesn't? >>> 3) What is the nature of the relationship or interaction between both >>> applications? >>> >> >> Thanks to everyone who replied to my question in such a helpful manner. >> >> It seems clear that there are distinct reasons to have both a dedicated >> web server and application server as part of your infrastructure. >> >> It seems though that nginx may be a more modern alternative to httpd but >> I will need to do more research to decide which is better for my precise >> needs. > > nginx vs Apache is a complex topic. > > But an oversimplified (!) answer is: > - nginx is best to serve static content > - Apache is best to do all sorts of things via modules > > Arne I don't know if its changed, but nginx was also supposedly better at managing more concurrent, long-lived connections (such as websockets). My understanding is that is because nginx used a limited number of threads to manage all the sockets, where Apache used a thread-per-connection model, using more resources per connection. Things may have changed since the last time I looked at the difference.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is it necessary to have both an application server AND a web server? Qu0ll <qu0ll64@gmail.com> - 2016-06-11 08:48 +1000
Re: Is it necessary to have both an application server AND a web server? Kevin McMurtrie <mcmurtrie@pixelmemory.us> - 2016-06-11 00:43 -0700
Re: Is it necessary to have both an application server AND a web server? Daniel Pitts <usenet@coloraura.com> - 2016-06-11 12:41 -0700
Re: Is it necessary to have both an application server AND a web server? Daniel Pitts <usenet@coloraura.com> - 2016-06-11 12:45 -0700
Re: Is it necessary to have both an application server AND a web server? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-06-11 17:45 -0400
Re: Is it necessary to have both an application server AND a web server? Daniel Pitts <usenet@coloraura.com> - 2016-06-12 21:05 -0700
Re: Is it necessary to have both an application server AND a web server? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-06-11 17:44 -0400
Re: Is it necessary to have both an application server AND a web server? Qu0ll <qu0ll64@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 06:58 +1000
Re: Is it necessary to have both an application server AND a web server? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-07-07 22:31 -0400
Re: Is it necessary to have both an application server AND a web server? Daniel Pitts <usenet@coloraura.com> - 2016-07-08 08:31 -0700
csiph-web