Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #34790

Re: Is it necessary to have both an application server AND a web server?

From Daniel Pitts <usenet@coloraura.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Is it necessary to have both an application server AND a web server?
Date 2016-07-08 08:31 -0700
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <nloh13$aq9$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <njfg37$1hj0$1@gioia.aioe.org> <njsfhf$2hu$1@gioia.aioe.org> <nln3ad$1mrg$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw


On 7/7/16 7:31 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
> On 6/15/2016 4:58 PM, Qu0ll wrote:
>> On 11/06/2016 08:48, Qu0ll wrote:
>>> DISCLAIMER: Server-side Java is not my forte.
>>>
>>> I have often noticed that in many places where I have worked, the
>>> companies have both a full application server such as JBoss/Wildfly AND
>>> a web server (typically Apache) installed and both seem to work
>>> together.
>>>
>>> 1) Is this necessary and if so, why?
>>> 2) What does a web server "provide" that an application server doesn't?
>>> 3) What is the nature of the relationship or interaction between both
>>> applications?
>>>
>>
>> Thanks to everyone who replied to my question in such a helpful manner.
>>
>> It seems clear that there are distinct reasons to have both a dedicated
>> web server and application server as part of your infrastructure.
>>
>> It seems though that nginx may be a more modern alternative to httpd but
>> I will need to do more research to decide which is better for my precise
>> needs.
>
> nginx vs Apache is a complex topic.
>
> But an oversimplified (!) answer is:
> - nginx is best to serve static content
> - Apache is best to do all sorts of things via modules
>
> Arne
I don't know if its changed, but nginx was also supposedly better at 
managing more concurrent, long-lived connections (such as websockets).

My understanding is that is because nginx used a limited number of 
threads to manage all the sockets, where Apache used a 
thread-per-connection model, using more resources per connection.

Things may have changed since the last time I looked at the difference.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Is it necessary to have both an application server AND a web server? Qu0ll <qu0ll64@gmail.com> - 2016-06-11 08:48 +1000
  Re: Is it necessary to have both an application server AND a web server? Kevin McMurtrie <mcmurtrie@pixelmemory.us> - 2016-06-11 00:43 -0700
  Re: Is it necessary to have both an application server AND a web server? Daniel Pitts <usenet@coloraura.com> - 2016-06-11 12:41 -0700
    Re: Is it necessary to have both an application server AND a web server? Daniel Pitts <usenet@coloraura.com> - 2016-06-11 12:45 -0700
      Re: Is it necessary to have both an application server AND a web server? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-06-11 17:45 -0400
        Re: Is it necessary to have both an application server AND a web server? Daniel Pitts <usenet@coloraura.com> - 2016-06-12 21:05 -0700
  Re: Is it necessary to have both an application server AND a web server? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-06-11 17:44 -0400
  Re: Is it necessary to have both an application server AND a web server? Qu0ll <qu0ll64@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 06:58 +1000
    Re: Is it necessary to have both an application server AND a web server? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-07-07 22:31 -0400
      Re: Is it necessary to have both an application server AND a web server? Daniel Pitts <usenet@coloraura.com> - 2016-07-08 08:31 -0700

csiph-web