Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #34377

Re: how does one explain this syntax?

Path csiph.com!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Knute Johnson <nospam@rabbitbrush.frazmtn.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: how does one explain this syntax?
Date Sun, 22 May 2016 22:13:18 -0700
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 19
Message-ID <nhu3al$36t$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <nhrhd5$7r6$1@reader1.panix.com> <nhsjoi$hd4$1@dont-email.me> <dqeiopFiq3jU1@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Injection-Date Mon, 23 May 2016 05:09:41 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="fc10d1b501433caa198830294d826923"; logging-data="3293"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+41zt3S0l+7trQ1yQBGmCe"
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0
In-Reply-To <dqeiopFiq3jU1@mid.individual.net>
Cancel-Lock sha1:onLDYxCfwwzckiwVgW0gnUdrg1Q=
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:34377

Show key headers only | View raw


On 5/22/2016 13:22, Robert Klemme wrote:
> And why not do this instead?
>
>     for (final Entry<Integer, String> entry : tmap.entrySet())
>       System.out.printf("key is: %d & value is: %s\n", entry.getKey(),
> entry.getValue());
>
> Note: tmap.get(key) is usually less efficient than fetching the value
> from an Entry.
>
> Kind regards
>
>     robert

I'll bite, why is it less efficient?

-- 

Knute Johnson

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

how does one explain this syntax? ruben safir <ruben@mrbrklyn.com> - 2016-05-22 01:51 -0400
  Re: how does one explain this syntax? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2016-05-22 10:05 +0000
  Re: how does one explain this syntax? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-05-22 07:21 -0400
    Re: how does one explain this syntax? Popping mad <rainbow@colition.gov> - 2016-05-22 20:21 +0000
      Re: how does one explain this syntax? Lars Enderin <lars.enderin@telia.com> - 2016-05-22 22:32 +0200
      Re: how does one explain this syntax? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-05-22 17:32 -0400
      Re: how does one explain this syntax? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 14:36 -0700
    Re: how does one explain this syntax? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 14:34 -0700
  Re: how does one explain this syntax? Knute Johnson <nospam@rabbitbrush.frazmtn.com> - 2016-05-22 08:41 -0700
    Re: how does one explain this syntax? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2016-05-22 22:22 +0200
      Re: how does one explain this syntax? Knute Johnson <nospam@rabbitbrush.frazmtn.com> - 2016-05-22 22:13 -0700
        Re: how does one explain this syntax? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-05-23 07:32 -0400
          Re: how does one explain this syntax? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2016-05-23 04:57 -0700
  Re: how does one explain this syntax? Popping mad <rainbow@colition.gov> - 2016-05-22 20:23 +0000
  Re: how does one explain this syntax? Roedy Green <inquiry@mindprod.com> - 2016-05-30 21:51 -0700
  Re: how does one explain this syntax? Roedy Green <inquiry@mindprod.com> - 2016-05-30 21:54 -0700
  Re: how does one explain this syntax? Roedy Green <inquiry@mindprod.com> - 2016-05-30 22:00 -0700
  Re: how does one explain this syntax? Roedy Green <inquiry@mindprod.com> - 2016-05-30 22:17 -0700

csiph-web