Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #34369
| Path | csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!1.us.feeder.erje.net!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!panix!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Popping mad <rainbow@colition.gov> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: how does one explain this syntax? |
| Date | Sun, 22 May 2016 20:21:57 +0000 (UTC) |
| Organization | PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC |
| Lines | 12 |
| Message-ID | <nht4d5$kuu$2@reader1.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | <nhrhd5$7r6$1@reader1.panix.com> <nhs4gm$lre$1@dont-email.me> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | www.mrbrklyn.com |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Trace | reader1.panix.com 1463948517 21470 96.57.23.82 (22 May 2016 20:21:57 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@panix.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Sun, 22 May 2016 20:21:57 +0000 (UTC) |
| User-Agent | Pan/0.139 (Sexual Chocolate; GIT bf56508 git://git.gnome.org/pan2) |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:34369 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Sun, 22 May 2016 07:21:15 -0400, Eric Sosman wrote: > /* Display content using Iterator*/ >> Set set = tmap.entrySet(); <<random obscure syntax... that is a >> constructor for another class? > > It's a method call. evidently it is a constructor the question because why do I need two levels of class hierarchy manually called just to do a simple foreach.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
how does one explain this syntax? ruben safir <ruben@mrbrklyn.com> - 2016-05-22 01:51 -0400
Re: how does one explain this syntax? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2016-05-22 10:05 +0000
Re: how does one explain this syntax? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-05-22 07:21 -0400
Re: how does one explain this syntax? Popping mad <rainbow@colition.gov> - 2016-05-22 20:21 +0000
Re: how does one explain this syntax? Lars Enderin <lars.enderin@telia.com> - 2016-05-22 22:32 +0200
Re: how does one explain this syntax? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-05-22 17:32 -0400
Re: how does one explain this syntax? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 14:36 -0700
Re: how does one explain this syntax? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 14:34 -0700
Re: how does one explain this syntax? Knute Johnson <nospam@rabbitbrush.frazmtn.com> - 2016-05-22 08:41 -0700
Re: how does one explain this syntax? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2016-05-22 22:22 +0200
Re: how does one explain this syntax? Knute Johnson <nospam@rabbitbrush.frazmtn.com> - 2016-05-22 22:13 -0700
Re: how does one explain this syntax? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-05-23 07:32 -0400
Re: how does one explain this syntax? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2016-05-23 04:57 -0700
Re: how does one explain this syntax? Popping mad <rainbow@colition.gov> - 2016-05-22 20:23 +0000
Re: how does one explain this syntax? Roedy Green <inquiry@mindprod.com> - 2016-05-30 21:51 -0700
Re: how does one explain this syntax? Roedy Green <inquiry@mindprod.com> - 2016-05-30 21:54 -0700
Re: how does one explain this syntax? Roedy Green <inquiry@mindprod.com> - 2016-05-30 22:00 -0700
Re: how does one explain this syntax? Roedy Green <inquiry@mindprod.com> - 2016-05-30 22:17 -0700
csiph-web