Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #34000

Re: javascript

Path	csiph.com!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: javascript
Date	Wed, 16 Mar 2016 20:26:37 -0400
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines	52
Message-ID	<ncctk5$v7c$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<be10265d-6a71-48b7-9fc5-06992d99b8cd@googlegroups.com> <ncbo3r$1ke$1@dont-email.me> <JavaScript-20160316151327@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <ncbro6$h5j$1@dont-email.me> <JavaScript-20160316155627@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host	ANasIS7Js9OyLQwgloeBLQ.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Complaints-To	abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
X-Notice	Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:34000

Show key headers only | View raw

On 3/16/2016 10:58 AM, Stefan Ram wrote:
> Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> writes:
>> Would you agree with me that posts about JavaScript are off-topic in
>> this newsgroup?
>
>    In Java SE, we can write:
>
> ScriptEngine engine = new ScriptEngineManager().getEngineByName("nashorn");
> engine.eval("print('Hello World!');");
>
>    , so questions about JavaScript could be interpreted as
>    questions about the »eval« method of Java SE's »ScriptEngine« object.

Bullshit.

Only questions the Java context and the interaction between
Java and JavaScript would be on topic.

A question only about JavaScript would be off-topic.

The fact that it can be run from Java does not make it on topic.

You can also run a COBOL program from Java via Runtime.exec (or
ProcessBuilder).

But only questions about the Java code and how to manage
input and output would be on topic.

Question only about COBOL would be off-topic.

>    After all, we also discuss regular expressions in this
>    newsgroup because they can be used in Java SE code, even
>    though regular expressions are a language different from Java.

Do we?

I would expect RE questions here to include significant more
Java code than RE "code".

A RE question without any Java involvement would certainly be
off topic.

>> How would you have said it?
>
>    I have made the decision to try to ignore advertisements for
>    blogs in this newsgroup and not directly to reply to them.

Well that part I agree with.

Arne

Thread

javascript Yogesh Sati <yogeshsati537@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 06:35 -0700
  Re: javascript Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> - 2016-03-16 09:49 -0400
    Re: javascript Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> - 2016-03-16 10:51 -0400
      Re: javascript Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> - 2016-03-16 11:43 -0400
        Re: javascript Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 10:16 -0700
      Re: javascript Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-03-16 20:26 -0400
    Re: javascript Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-03-16 20:36 -0400
      Re: javascript Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-03-16 21:28 -0400
        Re: javascript Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-03-16 22:00 -0400
          Re: javascript Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-03-16 22:03 -0400

csiph-web