Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #33826

Re: ...

From Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: ...
Date 2016-02-15 20:44 +0100
Organization albasani.net
Message-ID <n9t9r1$8pf$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <9fb2e9af-f704-4e51-9904-bb5b9283032f@googlegroups.com> <n9st0k$itv$1@dont-email.me> <n9stnk$hs7$1@gioia.aioe.org> <slrnnc3vmb.456.avl@login.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <n9sv7u$kh6$2@gioia.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw


Arne Vajhøj schrieb:
>> The Node constructor in the first Post might still see MAX_VALUE
>> elements within children, because the constructor can also be
>> called with a single array (and not only by individual Nodes).
>
> Very relevant point IMHO.

Well my point was Java doesn't have *infinite*
arrays. In the same sense as BigInteger doesn't
provide *infinite* integers.

BigInteger only provides elements of Nat, limited
by resources. And even if there were no resource
limites, any element you pick from Nat is still finite.

And since an array is basically a mapping from
a set {0..k-1} to its domain, where you pick k from
Nat, arrays are also pretty finite, provided the domain
elements are each finite.

And if you would allow for arrays that k can have any
value from Nat, if there were no resource limits, still
the array would be finite and not *infinite*.

Bye

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

... Popping mad <rainbow@colition.gov> - 2016-02-15 11:48 +0000
  Re: ... Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-02-15 07:52 -0500
    Re: ... Popping mad <rainbow@colition.gov> - 2016-02-15 13:09 +0000
      Re: ... Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 05:14 -0800
      Re: ... Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-02-15 08:43 -0500
      Re: ... Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> - 2016-02-15 13:46 +0000
        Re: ... Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 06:03 -0800
          Re: ... j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-02-15 15:54 +0100
            Re: ... Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 07:24 -0800
              Re: ... Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-02-15 11:08 -0500
                Re: ... Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-02-15 11:17 -0500
                Re: ... Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> - 2016-02-15 16:34 +0000
                Re: ... Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-02-15 11:43 -0500
                Re: ... Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-02-15 20:44 +0100
                Re: ... Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-02-15 20:44 +0100
                Re: ... Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-02-15 20:45 +0100
                Re: ... Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> - 2016-02-16 10:05 +0000
                Re: ... Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-02-15 21:46 -0500
      Re: ... Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-02-15 09:34 -0500

csiph-web