Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #33172
| From | Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Using this |
| Date | 2015-11-20 20:26 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <n2oh7h$mvm$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <87poz5ytcf.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> |
On 11/20/2015 3:21 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> What is the ‘best’ way to use this? I normally only use it when
> necessary. (A function has a parameter with the same name.) But at the
> company I am working there are people who say you should use it
> always. This resulted at on line of code with four times a this. Made
> the line a lot longer and I find it very ugly. Is there a rational for
> constantly using this?
I think there are 3 practices:
A) only use it when needed
B) also use it whenever the surrounding code use it
C) always use it
It is my impression that:
usage(A) > usage(B) > usage(C)
I am somewhat inclined to B myself.
public class X {
private int a;
private int b;
public X(int a) {
this.a = a;
this.b = FOOBAR; // this is not needed here but because it is
used at the line above then I think it looks more readable this way
}
...
}
Arne
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Using this Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-20 09:21 +0100
Re: Using this Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2015-11-20 08:15 -0500
Re: Using this Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 05:43 -0800
Re: Using this Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-11-20 21:52 +0000
Re: Using this Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-11-20 22:41 +0000
Re: Using this Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-20 20:26 -0500
Re: Using this Brixomatic <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-29 16:25 +0100
Re: Using this Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2015-11-29 22:51 -0800
csiph-web