Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #32502

Re: questions re Javascript

Path	csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.javascript, comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: questions re Javascript
Date	Thu, 3 Sep 2015 20:01:16 -0400
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines	44
Message-ID	<msan0e$19l$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<2b531f48-fff9-4c73-a116-22a3f110e919@googlegroups.com> <020920150828500988%timstreater@greenbee.net> <java-and-javascript-20150902121750@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host	NIM2IeSPVd0kE3mU1mieXw.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Complaints-To	abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
X-Notice	Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:28622 comp.lang.java.programmer:32502

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

On 9/2/2015 7:20 AM, Stefan Ram wrote:
> Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> writes:
>> Javascript has nothing to do with Java except for having a similar
>> sounding name.
>
>    There are so many similiarities between the two languages,
>    that I can't name them all. For example, in both Java and
>    JavaScript,
>
> 2 + "x"
>
>    gives »"2x"«, while in many other languages it does not.
>    In both Java and JavaScript, the modulo operator »%« can be
>    used for doubles, while in many other languages, it cannot.
>    Both have »instanceof« with a similar meaning, while other
>    languages do not. In both languages »x == x« is false, when
>    x is NaN.

If these are the criteria then a lot of languages are like Java.

>    And today, JavaScript is part of Java (the JRE), so it is
>    actually wrapped together with Java, and today JavaScript
>    can finally be used /to script Java/ out of the box.

I don't think that Java being able to execute JavaScript
tell much about whether the two languages are close.

I can not see any reason why you could not embed a JavaScript
engine in COBOL runtime.

>                                                          The
>    promise of its name is thus fulfilled. And both come from
>    the same company that also owns the trademark for both names.

No.

SUN created Java.

NetScape created JavaScript.

NetSCape got permission from SUN to use the Java prefix.

Arne

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: questions re Javascript Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-09-03 20:01 -0400
  Re: questions re Javascript Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-09-04 08:46 +0000
  Re: questions re Javascript Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-09-05 09:35 +0200

csiph-web