Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #32215

Re: method micro benachmarking with reflection

Path csiph.com!optima2.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: method micro benachmarking with reflection
Date Thu, 30 Jul 2015 14:20:58 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 31
Message-ID <mpdprg$pde$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <7c2ab94b-ee4e-41c9-ae71-3896210e80b7@googlegroups.com> <mpd4tj$4aq$1@dont-email.me> <72344bf7-bb09-45b2-9e7f-723576fbb639@googlegroups.com> <mpd8qo$ijj$1@dont-email.me> <d2ba844b-8397-476c-8980-5cafc89487ca@googlegroups.com> <mpdghq$hti$1@dont-email.me> <9c2e6e13-8d02-4bc6-ba02-91d9cbf4123b@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Injection-Date Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:19:29 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="858a9d65d95f4ea4d355bd116aa2cdbf"; logging-data="26030"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19tChBg/R/PUp9lqPH0hx1M"
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0
In-Reply-To <9c2e6e13-8d02-4bc6-ba02-91d9cbf4123b@googlegroups.com>
Cancel-Lock sha1:J0iZ1U/SJQbTVVN/TP9GyMAvNK4=
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:32215

Show key headers only | View raw


On 7/30/2015 1:30 PM, e.d.programmer@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 11:42:29 AM UTC-4, Eric Sosman wrote:
>>       One of the articles I linked to suggests doing "several"
>> times that many loop executions ...
>>
>>       ... in the *warmup* phase, before serious measurements.
>
> Right.  It helps if you call the method before getting the initial timestamp to exclude the one time (classloader, public class variable creation) stuff.

     The point (and a repeated warning in the links provided) is that
"call the method" is not enough of a warmup.  You must

     - Call the method enough times to be sure that the JIT has finished
       converting it to native code,

     - Call *exactly* the same methods during the timing phase as you
       did during the warmup, with exactly the same classes loaded and
       so on, lest the JIT change its mind,

     - Check that nothing unexpected happened during the timing phase.

> The 10000 was a random number.  It depends how long it takes to run the method once, and how long you want to spend testing it.  If 10000 calls only takes a few minutes you could do 100000 calls to be more accurate.  If 10000 calls takes 10 hours, do 100000 calls if you have a week to test...

     If 10000 calls takes a few minutes, it seems to me that we're no
longer in the realm of "micro benachmarking [sic]."  Microbenchmarks
are rather different from tests of system capacity, throughput, or
latency.  All are difficult, all present challenges of their very own.

-- 
esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid
"Don't be afraid of work. Make work afraid of you." -- TLM

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

method micro benachmarking with reflection philipp.kraus.flashpixx@gmail.com - 2015-07-30 03:41 -0700
  Re: method micro benachmarking with reflection Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-07-30 07:16 -0400
    Re: method micro benachmarking with reflection Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-07-30 21:52 -0400
      Re: method micro benachmarking with reflection Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-07-30 21:55 -0400
  Re: method micro benachmarking with reflection Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2015-07-30 08:23 -0400
    Re: method micro benachmarking with reflection e.d.programmer@gmail.com - 2015-07-30 06:00 -0700
      Re: method micro benachmarking with reflection Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2015-07-30 09:30 -0400
        Re: method micro benachmarking with reflection e.d.programmer@gmail.com - 2015-07-30 08:26 -0700
          Re: method micro benachmarking with reflection Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2015-07-30 11:42 -0400
            Re: method micro benachmarking with reflection e.d.programmer@gmail.com - 2015-07-30 10:30 -0700
              Re: method micro benachmarking with reflection Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2015-07-30 14:20 -0400
        Re: method micro benachmarking with reflection Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2015-07-30 16:08 -0400
    Re: method micro benachmarking with reflection philipp.kraus.flashpixx@gmail.com - 2015-07-30 06:11 -0700
    Re: method micro benachmarking with reflection v_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert) - 2015-07-30 21:33 +0000
      Re: method micro benachmarking with reflection Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2015-07-30 18:18 -0400
        Re: method micro benachmarking with reflection Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-07-30 20:13 -0400
  Re: method micro benachmarking with reflection Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2015-07-30 17:11 -0400
  Re: method micro benachmarking with reflection v_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert) - 2015-07-30 21:53 +0000
  Re: method micro benachmarking with reflection Sebastian <news@seyweiler.dyndns.org> - 2015-08-04 21:44 +0200

csiph-web