Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #31978
| From | Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: [JLS] new long[0][ -1 ] |
| Date | 2015-07-10 08:02 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <mnoc71$jah$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <slrnmpvci8.uoi.avl@login.logic.tuwien.ac.at> |
On 7/10/2015 7:52 AM, Andreas Leitgeb wrote:
> I've had a look at the JLS to find out about the more or less special
> case of a 2-dimensional array, whose first(outer) dimension is 0, but
> I didn't find any extra mention of that case.
>
> From what I read, it would evaluate *all* the dimensions, then check
> if any of them is negative.
>
> But if first dimension is 0, then the loop shown in the "equivalent as"-
> code sample would not get its body run even once, so actually it wouldn't
> even notice if any of the further dimensions was negative.
>
> What would be an accurate *purely JLS-based* prediction for
> new long[0][-1]
> (not caring about actual existing JVM implementations) ?
Intriguing question, but easily answered. 15.10.2, second
bullet, second sub-bullet:
"Next, the values of the dimension expressions are checked.
If the value of any DimExpr expression is less than zero,
then a NegativeArraySizeException is thrown."
--
esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid
"Don't be afraid of work. Make work afraid of you." -- TLM
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[JLS] new long[0][ -1 ] Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2015-07-10 11:52 +0000
Re: [JLS] new long[0][ -1 ] Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2015-07-10 08:02 -0400
Re: [JLS] new long[0][ -1 ] Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2015-07-10 12:58 +0000
Re: [JLS] new long[0][ -1 ] Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2015-07-10 09:45 -0400
Re: [JLS] new long[0][ -1 ] Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2015-07-10 14:19 +0000
Re: [JLS] new long[0][ -1 ] Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-07-10 20:19 +0000
Re: [JLS] new long[0][ -1 ] Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2015-07-10 16:43 -0400
Re: [JLS] new long[0][ -1 ] Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-07-10 22:24 +0000
Re: [JLS] new long[0][ -1 ] Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2015-07-11 07:33 -0400
Re: [JLS] new long[0][ -1 ] Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2015-07-10 21:17 +0000
Re: [JLS] new long[0][ -1 ] Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-07-10 22:29 +0000
Re: [JLS] new long[0][ -1 ] Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-07-27 22:10 -0400
Re: [JLS] new long[0][ -1 ] leif.roar@dimnakorr.com - 2015-07-28 01:53 -0500
Re: [JLS] new long[0][ -1 ] Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-07-28 19:13 -0400
Re: [JLS] new long[0][ -1 ] leif.roar@dimnakorr.com - 2015-07-28 21:50 -0500
Re: [JLS] new long[0][ -1 ] Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-07-28 11:13 +0000
Re: [JLS] new long[0][ -1 ] Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-07-31 19:41 -0400
Re: [JLS] new long[0][ -1 ] Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-08-01 10:23 +0000
Re: [JLS] new long[0][ -1 ] Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2015-07-10 17:07 +0200
Re: [JLS] new long[0][ -1 ] Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2015-07-10 18:10 +0000
csiph-web