Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #31241
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Robbie Brown <rob@example.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: About concurrency and functional programming |
| Date | Sat, 28 Feb 2015 21:26:12 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 39 |
| Message-ID | <mctboa$tg5$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <mcqnmv$9it$5@dont-email.me> <mcqogt$cea$8@dont-email.me> <mct30s$qhh$1@dont-email.me> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Injection-Date | Sat, 28 Feb 2015 21:25:30 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="896c419cace3c343dd1aaf493906dad2"; logging-data="30213"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18ml50JHdfgXuW+6a5P3K0dQXLlnNihqxo=" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1 |
| In-Reply-To | <mct30s$qhh$1@dont-email.me> |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:qjX7qIu/62W8RhjGNdvjwK57zEo= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:31241 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 28/02/15 18:56, Joshua Cranmer 🐧 wrote: > On 2/27/2015 6:45 PM, Ramine wrote: >> You will notice that "Bartosz Milewski" is saying that object oriented >> programming is not composable in presence of concurrency... but i think >> he is not correct... because what you can do is write near the >> property's interface(and don't forget to use set and get) and the >> methods that they are thread-safe, so when you you will inherit from the >> parent class, you will just read near the interface of the parent's >> class wich one is thread-safe and you will take that into account when >> you will compose by ineritance, and i think that this is easy to do >> and that it's efficient and no need for functional programming. > > ... Wow... I had known you were an idiot when you thought that Delphi > was topical in a Java newsgroup, but you've managed to prove yourself > more idiotic by thinking that composition and inheritance are the same > thing. > > I don't know where you learned object-oriented programming, but however > much it cost you was a waste of money if you passed without being able > to distinguish between composition and inheritance. hmm Thinking abstractly, inheritance is a perfectly valid way of implementing composition. In fact, we can look on inheritance as the purest form of composition (in an Object Oriented paradigm). An instance of a subclass cannot exist without the superclass extant, the subclass is (in part) *composed* of the superclass. How do you 'distinguish between composition and inheritance'? (as opposed to distinguishing between composition and aggregation) they are two entirely different (but ultimately, often connected) concepts. I do agree that the OP has a somewhat 'unique' way of putting his/her ideas across to say the least. -- Not floundering ... just fishing
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: About concurrency and functional programming Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2015-02-28 12:56 -0600
Re: About concurrency and functional programming Robbie Brown <rob@example.com> - 2015-02-28 21:26 +0000
Re: About concurrency and functional programming Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-02-28 21:28 -0500
Re: About concurrency and functional programming Robbie Brown <rob@example.com> - 2015-03-01 08:41 +0000
Re: About concurrency and functional programming Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2015-03-01 12:34 +0100
Re: About concurrency and functional programming Robbie Brown <rob@example.com> - 2015-03-01 14:26 +0000
Re: About concurrency and functional programming Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2015-03-01 15:30 +0100
Re: About concurrency and functional programming Robbie Brown <rob@example.com> - 2015-03-01 14:31 +0000
Re: About concurrency and functional programming Robbie Brown <rob@example.com> - 2015-03-01 14:30 +0000
Re: About concurrency and functional programming Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-03-01 11:29 -0500
Re: About concurrency and functional programming Robbie Brown <rob@example.com> - 2015-03-01 17:07 +0000
Re: About concurrency and functional programming Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2015-03-01 20:12 +0100
Re: About concurrency and functional programming Robbie Brown <rob@example.com> - 2015-03-01 20:31 +0000
Re: About concurrency and functional programming Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-03-01 16:13 -0500
Re: About concurrency and functional programming Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-03-01 16:11 -0500
Re: About concurrency and functional programming Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-03-01 16:17 -0500
Re: About concurrency and functional programming Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2015-03-01 12:03 -0600
csiph-web