Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #31241

Re: About concurrency and functional programming

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Robbie Brown <rob@example.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: About concurrency and functional programming
Date Sat, 28 Feb 2015 21:26:12 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 39
Message-ID <mctboa$tg5$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <mcqnmv$9it$5@dont-email.me> <mcqogt$cea$8@dont-email.me> <mct30s$qhh$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
Injection-Date Sat, 28 Feb 2015 21:25:30 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="896c419cace3c343dd1aaf493906dad2"; logging-data="30213"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18ml50JHdfgXuW+6a5P3K0dQXLlnNihqxo="
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1
In-Reply-To <mct30s$qhh$1@dont-email.me>
Cancel-Lock sha1:qjX7qIu/62W8RhjGNdvjwK57zEo=
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:31241

Show key headers only | View raw


On 28/02/15 18:56, Joshua Cranmer 🐧 wrote:
> On 2/27/2015 6:45 PM, Ramine wrote:
>> You will notice that "Bartosz Milewski" is saying that object oriented
>> programming is not composable in presence of concurrency... but i think
>> he is not correct... because what you can do is write near the
>> property's interface(and don't forget to use set and get) and the
>> methods that they are thread-safe, so when you you will inherit from the
>> parent class, you will just read near the interface of the parent's
>> class wich one is thread-safe and you will take that into account when
>> you will compose by ineritance, and i think that this is easy to do
>> and that it's efficient and no need for functional programming.
>
> ... Wow... I had known you were an idiot when you thought that Delphi
> was topical in a Java newsgroup, but you've managed to prove yourself
> more idiotic by thinking that composition and inheritance are the same
> thing.
>
> I don't know where you learned object-oriented programming, but however
> much it cost you was a waste of money if you passed without being able
> to distinguish between composition and inheritance.

hmm

Thinking abstractly, inheritance is a perfectly valid way of 
implementing composition. In fact, we can look on inheritance as the 
purest form of composition (in an Object Oriented paradigm). An instance 
of a subclass cannot exist without the superclass extant, the subclass 
is (in part) *composed* of the superclass.

How do you 'distinguish between composition and inheritance'?
(as opposed to distinguishing between composition and aggregation)
they are two entirely different (but ultimately, often connected) concepts.

I do agree that the OP has a somewhat 'unique' way of putting his/her 
ideas across to say the least.


-- 
Not floundering ... just fishing

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: About concurrency and functional programming Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2015-02-28 12:56 -0600
  Re: About concurrency and functional programming Robbie Brown <rob@example.com> - 2015-02-28 21:26 +0000
    Re: About concurrency and functional programming Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-02-28 21:28 -0500
      Re: About concurrency and functional programming Robbie Brown <rob@example.com> - 2015-03-01 08:41 +0000
        Re: About concurrency and functional programming Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2015-03-01 12:34 +0100
          Re: About concurrency and functional programming Robbie Brown <rob@example.com> - 2015-03-01 14:26 +0000
            Re: About concurrency and functional programming Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2015-03-01 15:30 +0100
              Re: About concurrency and functional programming Robbie Brown <rob@example.com> - 2015-03-01 14:31 +0000
            Re: About concurrency and functional programming Robbie Brown <rob@example.com> - 2015-03-01 14:30 +0000
            Re: About concurrency and functional programming Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-03-01 11:29 -0500
              Re: About concurrency and functional programming Robbie Brown <rob@example.com> - 2015-03-01 17:07 +0000
                Re: About concurrency and functional programming Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2015-03-01 20:12 +0100
                Re: About concurrency and functional programming Robbie Brown <rob@example.com> - 2015-03-01 20:31 +0000
                Re: About concurrency and functional programming Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-03-01 16:13 -0500
                Re: About concurrency and functional programming Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-03-01 16:11 -0500
                Re: About concurrency and functional programming Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-03-01 16:17 -0500
    Re: About concurrency and functional programming Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2015-03-01 12:03 -0600

csiph-web